ehrenfest
- 2,001
- 1
Are Maxwell's equations thought to be exact? I realize this question is very open-ended and loosely-phrased.
Maxwell's equations are mathematically exact but physically approximate due to the inherent measurement uncertainties of fundamental constants such as epsilon-not (ε₀) and mu-not (μ₀). While these equations provide a robust framework for classical electromagnetism, they do not yield exact physical predictions because the constants involved are not defined to an exact value. Quantum Electrodynamics (QED) introduces variations in predictions compared to classical interpretations, reinforcing the notion that physical models are approximations rather than absolute truths.
PREREQUISITESPhysicists, electrical engineers, and students of electromagnetism seeking to deepen their understanding of the nature of physical laws and the role of measurement in scientific equations.
lzkelley said:Yes they are. But keep in mind that each one of maxwell's equations inevitably contains some sort of fundamental constant (mu or epsilon usually; not to mention electric charge etc etc) which are measured quantities and therein not exact.
Poop-Loops said:Epsilon-not.
Mu-not is defined. At least, that's what my professor said.
tgt said:Mathematically, correct hence exact. Physically, it's a good approximation and only an approximation to model phenomena. Hence not exact physically. Is anything exact physically? No.
Well, if you take into account the masses of the apples, which is what is physically relevant when you buy apples, then you have less mass when the two apples are together, right ?dst said:I have one apple, I add another one, I have exactly two apples.
Pfft, technicalities. If truth be told, the error is in disguise - it's either present in the definition(s) or as a constant in whatever expression you're using.humanino said:Well, if you take into account the masses of the apples, which is what is physically relevant when you buy apples, then you have less mass when the two apples are together, right ?![]()
Poop-Loops said:Epsilon-not.
Mu-not is defined. At least, that's what my professor said.
humanino said:Well, if you take into account the masses of the apples, which is what is physically relevant when you buy apples, then you have less mass when the two apples are together, right ?![]()
humanino said:Well, if you take into account the masses of the apples, which is what is physically relevant when you buy apples, then you have less mass when the two apples are together, right ?![]()
I guess sorewebster said:so, that applies, too, when two physicists get together?![]()
They have gravitational biding energy, don't they ?ehrenfest said:Umm--what? Are you using special relativity?