ehrenfest
- 2,001
- 1
Are Maxwell's equations thought to be exact? I realize this question is very open-ended and loosely-phrased.
The discussion centers around the nature of Maxwell's equations, specifically whether they are considered exact or approximate. Participants explore the implications of fundamental constants and the physical interpretations of these equations, touching on both theoretical and practical aspects.
Participants express differing views on the exactness of Maxwell's equations, with no consensus reached. Some maintain they are exact, while others emphasize their approximate nature in physical applications.
Participants reference specific constants and their definitions, but there is uncertainty regarding the exact nature of these constants and their implications for the equations. The discussion also touches on the philosophical aspects of measurement and physical reality.
lzkelley said:Yes they are. But keep in mind that each one of maxwell's equations inevitably contains some sort of fundamental constant (mu or epsilon usually; not to mention electric charge etc etc) which are measured quantities and therein not exact.
Poop-Loops said:Epsilon-not.
Mu-not is defined. At least, that's what my professor said.
tgt said:Mathematically, correct hence exact. Physically, it's a good approximation and only an approximation to model phenomena. Hence not exact physically. Is anything exact physically? No.
Well, if you take into account the masses of the apples, which is what is physically relevant when you buy apples, then you have less mass when the two apples are together, right ?dst said:I have one apple, I add another one, I have exactly two apples.
Pfft, technicalities. If truth be told, the error is in disguise - it's either present in the definition(s) or as a constant in whatever expression you're using.humanino said:Well, if you take into account the masses of the apples, which is what is physically relevant when you buy apples, then you have less mass when the two apples are together, right ?![]()
Poop-Loops said:Epsilon-not.
Mu-not is defined. At least, that's what my professor said.
humanino said:Well, if you take into account the masses of the apples, which is what is physically relevant when you buy apples, then you have less mass when the two apples are together, right ?![]()
humanino said:Well, if you take into account the masses of the apples, which is what is physically relevant when you buy apples, then you have less mass when the two apples are together, right ?![]()
I guess sorewebster said:so, that applies, too, when two physicists get together?![]()
They have gravitational biding energy, don't they ?ehrenfest said:Umm--what? Are you using special relativity?