May we equate linear KE with rotational KE?

  • Thread starter Thread starter lizzyb
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Linear Rotational
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem involving a projectile colliding with a stationary rod, focusing on the kinetic energy before and after the collision. The subject area includes concepts of kinetic energy, inelastic collisions, and rotational dynamics.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between initial translational kinetic energy and final rotational kinetic energy, questioning how to equate or compare these forms of energy. There are discussions about conservation of momentum and energy, particularly in the context of elastic versus inelastic collisions.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on using conservation of momentum to analyze the system, while others express confusion over the apparent increase in kinetic energy after the collision. There is an ongoing exploration of the calculations involved, with some participants questioning the assumptions made regarding energy conservation.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the collision is inelastic, which implies that kinetic energy is not conserved. There are references to specific values and equations used in the calculations, highlighting the complexity of the problem and the need for careful algebraic manipulation.

lizzyb
Messages
167
Reaction score
0
The question is about a projectile hitting a rod; I need to find how much KE is lost.

Using [tex]K_f = \frac{1}{2} I_f \omega_f^2[/tex] I came up with 162.253; using [tex]K_i = \frac{1}{2} m v^2[/tex] (m being the mass of the projectile), I came up with 16.9785; Is the answer [tex]K_f - K_i[/tex] in this form?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, but it looks to me like you gained a buttload of free energy. Does the projectile stop moving after it makes contact?
 
Yes, total kinetic energy is conserved in an elastic collision.
 
The projectile sticks to the end of the stationary rod. [Edited] It seems like KE was gained.
 
Last edited:
lizzyb said:
The projectile sticks to the end of the stationary rod. [Edited] It seems like KE was gained.

In that case, it's a plastic collision, and all kinetic energy turns into rotational kinetic energy, since the projectile and the rod rotate together around some point. If we assume that there is no deformation, then it's an ideal plastic collision, and no energy is lost.

Edit: after seeing what Doc Al wrote and consulting my dynamics textbook, I concluded not to write nonsence. Kinetic energy is not conserved. :smile:
 
Last edited:
State the full problem. You'll need to use conservation of momentum to find the final speed (translational and rotational) of the "stick + projectile" system. (Kinetic energy is not conserved.)
 
But then [tex]K_i = K_f[/tex] yes? Yet they are different values.
 
Please state the problem fully. (If a projectile hits a rod and sticks to it, that's an inelastic collision--kinetic energy is not conserved.)
 
A projectile of mass m moves to the right with speed v. The projectile strikes and sticks to the end of a stationary rod of mass M and length d that is pivoted about a frictionless axle through the center.

How much KE is lost in the collision relative to the initial KE?

I have [tex]I_f = \frac{M d^2}{12} + m(\frac{1}{2} d)^2 = \frac{d^2}{12}(M + 3m)[/tex]

and I found the [tex]\omega_f[/tex] of the system correctly:

[tex]\omega_f = \frac{6 m v}{(M + 3m)d}[/tex]
 
Last edited:
  • #10
The initial KE is pure translational KE of the projectile; the final KE is pure rotational KE of the "stick + projectile" system. (Angular momentum is conserved.)
 
  • #11
so [tex]K_i[/tex] is translational KE, [tex]K_f[/tex] is rotational KE; how do I put these into similar units so I can find out how much KE was lost?

ok, sorry for jumping ahead, we have [tex]K_i = \frac{1}{2} m v^2[/tex] but [tex]\omega = \frac{v_f}{r}[/tex], thus [tex]K_i - K_f = \frac{1}{2} m v^2 - \frac{d^2}{24}(M + 3m)(\frac{v_f}{r})^2[/tex]. ??
 
Last edited:
  • #12
Even if change [tex]\omega[\tex] into [tex]v[\tex], the KE goes up as where the question implies that KE is lost.[/tex][/tex]
 
  • #13
[tex]K_i = \frac{1}{2} m v^2[/tex]

[tex]K_f = \frac{1}{2} I_f \omega^2[/tex]
 
  • #14
For [tex]K_f[/tex] I end up with a greater KE than [tex]K_i[/tex] yet the question states "How much kinetic energy is lost in the collision relative to the initial kinetic energy"
 
  • #15
I don't see how you are getting a final energy greater than the initial. You have the correct values for angular speed and rotational inertia, so just plug them into the expression for rotational KE. Unless you're making an algebraic error, your final KE will be less than the initial. (If you're still stuck, show your work and we'll take a look.)
 
  • #16
Thank you for your help.

A projectile with m = 1.47 kg moves tothe right with speed v=23.1 m/s. The projectile strikes and sticks to the end of a stationary rod of mass M = 6.25 kg and length d = 1.82 m that is pivoted about a frictionless axle through it's center.

[tex]K_i = \frac{1}{2} m v^2 = \frac{1}{2} 1.47 (23.1)^2 = 392.203[/tex]
[tex]K_f = \frac{1}{2} I \omega^2 = \frac{1}{2} \frac{d^2}{12}(M + 3m) (\frac{6 m v}{(M + 3m) d})^2 = 162.253[/tex]

[edit:]oh my goodness! i was not squaring the velocity of the projectile! that makes all the difference. thank you everyone for your patience.
 
  • #17
Don't plug in numbers until the last second. First simplify that expression for final KE.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K