MCNP terminology question -- Effective Full Power Days (EFPDs)

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion clarifies the definition and application of Effective Full Power Days (EFPDs) and Effective Full Power Hours (EFPHs) in the context of MCNP simulations. EFPDs are calculated based on the reactor's power output, where operating at 50% power for one day equates to 0.5 EFPD, and 80% power for one day equates to 0.8 EFPD. The trapezoidal rule is recommended for calculating EFPDs when power levels vary throughout the day. Additionally, the discussion highlights the importance of burnup calculations in relation to fuel performance properties.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of MCNP (Monte Carlo N-Particle Transport Code)
  • Knowledge of reactor physics and power output calculations
  • Familiarity with burnup metrics such as MWd/kgU and GWd/tU
  • Basic grasp of thermal properties of nuclear fuel and cladding materials
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the trapezoidal rule for calculating variable power outputs in reactor simulations
  • Explore the impact of burnup on thermal conductivity of nuclear fuel
  • Study the differences between EFPD and EFPH in reactor performance analysis
  • Investigate the effects of fast fluence on Zr-alloy cladding properties
USEFUL FOR

Nuclear engineers, reactor physicists, and anyone involved in fuel performance analysis and MCNP simulations will benefit from this discussion.

Rofida
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
the term EFPDs
for MCNP users, i would like to ask about terminologies: if i depleted a fuel assembly under constant power, is the number of days in the out can be used as Effective Full Power Days (EFPDs), or this term has another specific meaning?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Effective Full Power Days (EFPD) or Effective Full Power Hours (EFPH) are useful for calculating burnup in terms of MWd/kgU, or GWd/tU, or GWd/tHM. If a reactor operates at 50% power for 1 day, then that would give 0.5 EFPD, or 12 EFPH. Similarly, if a reactor operated at 80% of full power for one day, then that would give 0.8 EFPD, or 19.2 EFPH. If the power is varied over a day, then one could use the trapezoidal rule to calculate the equivalent EFPD or EFPH.

Note that some folks like to calculate with EFPH, and some use burnup in terms of mass of UO2 rather than mass of metal.

In fuel performance, some properties and behavioral models are dependent on burnup, e.g., thermal conductivity of the fuel, while other properties, e.g., growth, strength and ductility of the Zr-alloy cladding, depend on fast fluence (and temperature).
 
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: Alex A and berkeman

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
5K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
6K