Is an MD/PhD Dual Degree Program Right for You?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the MD/PhD dual degree programs, exploring their structure, requirements for admission, potential career paths, and the relevance of the PhD in medical and research contexts. Participants share personal experiences and inquire about the implications of holding such degrees in various professional settings.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants inquire about the admission requirements for MD/PhD programs, speculating on the importance of GPA, MCAT scores, and undergraduate research experience.
  • One participant shares a personal account of a veterinary MD/PhD program, emphasizing its competitiveness and the commitment required over seven years.
  • Questions arise regarding the primary focus of these programs, particularly whether they are aimed at medical research positions and the nature of patient contact for graduates.
  • There is a discussion about the role of the PhD in enhancing the skills of clinicians to contribute to academic publications.
  • Some participants assert that graduates can pursue both clinical and research positions, while others note that many successful researchers hold only an MD.
  • Concerns are raised about the necessity of a PhD for research roles, with some arguing that it signifies a deeper training in research methodologies.
  • Participants discuss the fields in which the PhD is typically awarded, noting that it often relates to medicine but can vary by institution.
  • There is a debate about the prevalence of MD/PhD holders among medical school faculty, with some asserting that many professors hold only MDs or PhDs.
  • Clarifications are made regarding the teaching capabilities of MDs in university settings outside of medical schools, particularly in basic science departments.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the necessity and value of the PhD in conjunction with the MD, indicating that the discussion remains unresolved regarding its impact on research careers and academic positions.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include varying definitions of what constitutes a relevant field for the PhD, differing institutional requirements, and the ambiguity surrounding the career trajectories of MD/PhD graduates versus those with single degrees.

Julio R
Messages
51
Reaction score
1
Has anyone in this forum started or finished this kind of program. If so, how did you get in? I imagine it requires perfect GPA and MCAT score, but is there other factors like what your major is or research done as an undergrad?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
My niece is in one for veterinary science at Cornell. Its a 7 year program and highly competitive. She'll be a Phd and a DVM.

You have to be prepared for the work for those 7 years or decide to complete one half or the other because if you burn out or drop out then you have nothing. They give you choices about what tracks you can take in years like 2 - 3 - 2 or 4 - 3 or 3 - 4 ...
 
Are those programs mainly aimed at medical research positions? What kind of patient contacts would you have with that type of degree combination?
 
The theory behind the dual DvM and PhD was to give the DVM the skills to write journal papers at the level of a PhD from things found while being a practicing clinician.
 
So a graduate from those programs can work in clinical and research positions?
 
Julio R said:
So a graduate from those programs can work in clinical and research positions?

Yes, I think that's the general idea.
 
Julio R said:
So a graduate from those programs can work in clinical and research positions?

Yes, it is common for physicians in academic centers to hold this degree combination. They see patients like any other physician.

However, it is not necessary to hold the PhD to be a clinical scientist. Many clinical physicians with MD alone are quite accomplished researchers and prolific publishers.
 
EricVT said:
Yes, it is common for physicians in academic centers to hold this degree combination. They see patients like any other physician.

However, it is not necessary to hold the PhD to be a clinical scientist. Many clinical physicians with MD alone are quite accomplished researchers and prolific publishers.

So does the PhD make a difference if you want to do research, or is it just for show?
 
Completion of the PhD shows a deeper level of training in the research process and requires the degree holder to achieve a level of expertise in a second doctoral field (the first being medicine). I don't think anyone would say the PhD is "just for show" as it certainly carries weight and is a meaningful degree.
 
  • #10
Would the PhD be directly in medicine, or in another field, i.e. biology, immunology, or chemistry, etcetera?
 
  • #11
The PhD is typically completed in a field with application to medicine (biology, biophysics, biomedical sciences, genomics, chemistry, immunology, cellular biology, neuroscience, virology, etc.).

Allowed fields vary by institution.
 
  • #12
Are med school professors not often found to be holders of MD/PhD degrees anyway?

Or perhaps they got the PhD some time after...
 
  • #13
Mépris said:
Are med school professors not often found to be holders of MD/PhD degrees anyway?

Some professors are MD/PhD, but most are MD alone and some are PhD alone.
 
  • #14
Do you mean professors in medical school? Or something related like biology or chemistry? Also, can you teach biology our chemistry in a university with just an MD?
 
  • #15
Medical school faculty run the gamut from single degree holders to all sorts of multiple degree holders (I've met academic oral surgeons who have a dental degree, an MD, and a Ph.D.). It's also important to note that you have both basic science departments as well as clinical departments in medical schools - a former labmate (a Ph.D.) is presently a faculty member in a medical school biochemistry department, he is not teaching anything clinical in nature.

Insofar as an MD teaching courses in a standard university chemistry or biology department, unless they're (cross) appointed in that department, I don't see it happening. There are MDs who decide to abandon medicine, do postdoctoral work, and then pursue a career in basic science. But not MDs who figure that their long-ago undergrad background - which might not even be suitable, especially in chemistry - more than qualifies them in conjunction with their professional degree.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 50 ·
2
Replies
50
Views
12K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
Replies
25
Views
7K