Mean energy of a 3D (quantum) harmonic oscillator

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the mean energy of a 3D quantum harmonic oscillator (QHO) in relation to Path Integral Monte Carlo simulations. The analytic mean energy for a 1D QHO is derived from the Hamiltonian \(\hat H = \frac{{\hbar^2}}{{2m}}\frac{{\partial^2}}{{\partial x^2}} + \frac{1}{2}m\omega^2 x^2\) and is expressed as \(\left\langle H \right\rangle = \frac{1}{2}\hbar \omega \coth \left( {\frac{1}{2}\beta \hbar \omega } \right)\). The user seeks to determine if the mean energy for a 3D QHO can be represented as \(\left\langle H_{3D} \right\rangle = 3\hbar \omega \coth \left( {\frac{1}{2}\beta \hbar \omega } \right)\), confirming the relationship holds true for quantum systems.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles, particularly harmonic oscillators
  • Familiarity with Path Integral Monte Carlo simulations
  • Knowledge of statistical mechanics, specifically the concept of inverse temperature (beta)
  • Proficiency in mathematical expressions involving Hamiltonians and traces
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the derivation of mean energy for 3D quantum harmonic oscillators
  • Explore the implications of degrees of freedom in quantum systems
  • Learn about advanced Path Integral Monte Carlo techniques for higher dimensions
  • Investigate the differences between classical and quantum harmonic oscillators
USEFUL FOR

Researchers and students in quantum mechanics, physicists working on computational simulations, and anyone interested in the properties of quantum harmonic oscillators.

HappyJazz
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
This is not really homework, just a project I'm toying with in my sparetime. I'm doing some Path Integral Monte Carlo simulations, for now just for the 1D quantum harmonic oscillator. Anyways, currently I compare my results to the analytic mean energy of a 1D quantum harmonic oscillator, given by the Hamiltonion

\hat H = \frac{{{\hbar ^2}}}{{2m}}\frac{{{\partial ^2}}}{{\partial {x^2}}} + \frac{1}{2}m{\omega ^2}{x^2}

with the trace given as

\int\limits_{ - \infty }^\infty {\left\langle x \right|\exp \left( { - \beta \hat H} \right)\left| x \right\rangle } = \frac{{\exp \left( { - 0.5\beta \hbar \omega } \right)}}{{1 - \exp \left( { - 0.5\beta \hbar \omega } \right)}}.

Beta is representing inverse temperature. From the mean energy in terms of the trace we get

\left\langle H \right\rangle = - \frac{\partial }{{\partial \beta }}\ln \sum\limits_x {\left\langle x \right|\exp \left( { - \beta \hat H} \right)\left| x \right\rangle },

which finally amounts to

\left\langle H \right\rangle = \frac{1}{2}\hbar \omega \coth \left( {\frac{1}{2}\beta \hbar \omega } \right).

My next step is to expand my program to 3 dimensions. I know that the energy of the classical harmonic oscillator in 3D is simply the result from 1D times the degrees of freedom (3 translational, 2 rotational and 1 vibrational), but does this also hold for the Quantum version of the harmonic oscillator?

I.e. is

\left\langle {{H_{3D}}} \right\rangle = 3\hbar \omega \coth \left( {\frac{1}{2}\beta \hbar \omega } \right)

true?

Thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Actually it should only have 3 degrees of freedom, I was thinking of a diatomic molecule. A single particle described as a 3D QHO got 3 degrees of freedom.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K