Mean of Sum of IID Random Variables

Click For Summary
The mean of the sum of n independent identically distributed (IID) random variables is indeed the sum of their means, expressed as E[Y] = nE[X]. This holds true regardless of whether the random variables are independent or have the same distribution. The principle that the mean of a sum equals the sum of the means applies universally to any collection of random variables. Clarification was provided on the application of this concept beyond single-variable functions. Understanding this property is essential in probability and statistics.
ObliviousSage
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
If X is some RV, and Y is a sum of n independent Xis (i.e. n independent identically distributed random variables with distribution X), is the mean of Y just the sum of the means of the n Xs?

That is, if Y=X1+X2+...+Xn, is E[Y]=nE[X]?

I know that for one-to-one order-preserving functions, if Y=h(X) then E[Y]=E[h(X)] with a single variable X, but I'm not sure if it works with multiple Xs, even with something as simple as addition.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The mean of a sum is the sum of the means. The terms in the sum do not have to be independent or have the same distribution.
 
mathman said:
The mean of a sum is the sum of the means. The terms in the sum do not have to be independent or have the same distribution.

Awesome, I wasn't sure. Thanks for clearing that up!
 
The standard _A " operator" maps a Null Hypothesis Ho into a decision set { Do not reject:=1 and reject :=0}. In this sense ( HA)_A , makes no sense. Since H0, HA aren't exhaustive, can we find an alternative operator, _A' , so that ( H_A)_A' makes sense? Isn't Pearson Neyman related to this? Hope I'm making sense. Edit: I was motivated by a superficial similarity of the idea with double transposition of matrices M, with ## (M^{T})^{T}=M##, and just wanted to see if it made sense to talk...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K