Mean squared distance for (persistent) random walks

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter IttyBittyBit
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mean Random
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on deriving the mean-squared distance (MSD) from the velocity autocorrelation function for random walks. The user references a specific page that outlines the mathematical derivation but initially struggles with the integration process involving the substitution u' = u + s. Ultimately, the user resolves the issue independently and shares a link to their solution on Mathbin.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of random walk theory
  • Familiarity with velocity autocorrelation functions
  • Basic knowledge of integration techniques in calculus
  • Experience with mathematical notation and derivations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of mean-squared distance in random walks
  • Explore the properties of velocity autocorrelation functions
  • Learn advanced integration techniques relevant to stochastic processes
  • Review related mathematical concepts on platforms like Mathbin
USEFUL FOR

Researchers in statistical mechanics, physicists studying stochastic processes, and mathematicians interested in random walks and their applications.

IttyBittyBit
Messages
160
Reaction score
0
Hi, I'm looking at how to derive the mean-squared-distance from the velocity autocorrelation for a random walk. It is given on this page: http://www.compsoc.man.ac.uk/~lucky/Democritus/Theory/msd2.html

Near the middle of that page the author says 'defining u'=u+s and integrating over u, results in the following form where the ensemble average has also been taken: ', but I can't seem to figure out how that integral following that statement was derived. I know what the velocity autocorrelation is, but when I set u'=u+s and integrate, it doesn't seem to pop up. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Never mind, I figured it out. For the curious, I wrote this mathbin:

http://mathbin.net/89902
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
9K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
19K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
12K