Mean Value Theorem Applications

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the application of the Mean Value Theorem to the function f(x) = arctan(||x||), defined from R^n to R. The original poster is tasked with proving a specific inequality involving this function, while grappling with the challenges posed by its differentiability and the convexity of the domain.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to understand the implications of the function's differentiability and the nature of the set S, questioning how to satisfy the theorem's conditions. Participants suggest breaking the problem into cases based on the position of the point 0 relative to x and y, exploring the implications of these cases on the differentiability of f.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively exploring different cases to address the differentiability of f within an open, convex set. Some guidance has been offered regarding how to approach the problem by considering the line between x and y, though there is no explicit consensus on the best method to proceed.

Contextual Notes

There is an ongoing discussion about the implications of the function's differentiability at the origin and the nature of the convex set S, particularly in relation to the points x and y chosen for the proof. The original poster expresses concern about the conditions of the theorem not being fully satisfied.

kingwinner
Messages
1,266
Reaction score
0
Q: Prove that if f: R^n -> R is defined by f(x)=arctan(||x||), then |f(x)-f(y)| <= ||x-y|| FOR ALL x,y E R^n.
[<= means less than or equal to]

Theorem: (a corollary to the mean value theorem)
Suppose f is differentiable on an open, convex set S and ||gradient [f(x)]|| <= M for all x E S. Then |f(b) - f(a)| <= M ||b-a|| for all a,b E S.

Now the trouble is that f(x)=arctan(||x||) is not differentiable at x=0 E R^n since the partial derivatives doesn't exist at x=0. Even worse, notice that S = R^n \ {0} is not convex.

Then how I can show that "f is differentiable on an open, convex set S"? (what is S in this case?) I strongly believe that this is an important step because if the conditions in the theorem are not fully satisifed, then there is no guarantee that the conclusion will hold. But this seems to be the only theorem that will help. What should I do?

Next, how can I prove that the conclusion is true FOR ALL x,y E R^n ?


Thanks for explaining!:smile:
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
If you want to use that theorem, just break the problem into cases. Suppose x and y are points such that 0 is not on the line between x and y. Then you shouldn't have any trouble finding an open convex set containing x and y that doesn't contain 0. Now what happens if 0 is on the line? You could break things up more, but I think it's easier to think about a sequence x_n->x where 0 is not on the line connecting x_n and y.
 
Last edited:
How can I break the problem into cases such that in each case, f is differentiable on an open, convex set S?
 
Do one case at a time. If 0 is not on the line between x and y, then what? If it is, then you are going to have a lot of trouble finding an open convex set on which f is differentiable containing x and y. Obviously. So give up that hope. Please reread my post.
 
If 0 is on the line, you could try breaking the problem up by arguing about the difference between x and 0 and y and 0, but that doesn't involve a single convex domain of differentiability. And it's certainly more complicated.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K