Meaning of Curvature Scalar (R) in GR & Its Evolution

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Magister
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Curvature Scalar
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the meaning and implications of the curvature scalar (R) in General Relativity (GR), particularly its evolution in different contexts such as solar system scales versus cosmological scales. Participants also explore related concepts including the Ricci and Einstein tensors, the interpretation of curvature in various metrics, and the relationship between curvature and tidal effects.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question the meaning of the curvature scalar (R) and its evolution, particularly why it is considered small in the solar system and large on cosmological scales.
  • Others seek an intuitive understanding of the Ricci and Einstein tensors, noting that they are sometimes described as "average curvature" but find this insufficient for distinguishing between different components.
  • A participant points out that the curvature scalar for the Schwarzschild metric is zero, despite non-zero components of the Riemann tensor, which relate to tidal potentials.
  • There is a discussion about how, in an expanding cosmological model, curvature is inversely proportional to the square of the 'radius', leading to interpretations of decreasing curvature as the universe expands.
  • Some express confusion over the fact that R=0 does not imply a flat manifold, with one participant noting that all Christoffel symbols must vanish for a flat spacetime.
  • Another participant emphasizes that a flat space requires the Riemann tensor to be zero, while the scalar curvature is derived from the traces of the Riemann tensor.
  • There is a mention of the relationship between tidal effects and spacetime curvature, with some participants agreeing that they are essentially the same concept described differently.
  • One participant notes that the Ricci scalar is one of many curvature scalars and highlights that Einstein's equation dictates its behavior, particularly in vacuum conditions.
  • It is mentioned that non-zero curvature scalars can indicate curvature, but the absence of curvature does not necessarily imply a flat spacetime.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various interpretations and understandings of curvature and its implications, with no clear consensus reached on the intuitive meanings or implications of the curvature scalar and related tensors. Multiple competing views remain regarding the interpretation of curvature in different metrics and contexts.

Contextual Notes

Some limitations include the dependence on specific definitions of curvature, the unresolved nature of certain mathematical steps, and the distinction between local flatness and global curvature in spacetime.

Magister
Messages
82
Reaction score
0
What is the meaning of the curvature scalar (R) in GR? More precisely, what is the meaning of it's evolution? Why when we are concerning the solar system we take R to be small and when we are concerning the cosmological scales the we assume R to be large?

Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I have the same question for the Ricci and Einstein tensors. I know how to compute them, but I don't have an intuitive sense of what they mean. They are sometimes described as being a kind of "average curvature" at a point, but that doesn't explain the difference between, say, [tex]G_\theta _\phi[/tex] and [tex]G_\phi _r.[/tex]
 
Surprisingly, the curvature scalar for the Schwarzschild metric is zero. There are non-zero components of the Riemann tensor. They are made from second derivatives of the metric and some of them represent tidal potentials.

In an expanding cosmological model, the curvature is inversely proportional to the square of the 'radius'. So it's high at the beginning and is decreasing as the cosmos expands.
 
Mentz114 said:
In an expanding cosmological model, the curvature is inversely proportional to the square of the 'radius'. So it's high at the beginning and is decreasing as the cosmos expands.

But is that because as the universe expand, the curvature in at a point is getting smaller? If we look at the cosmos like a sphere, as the radius expands the curvature in the surface is getting smaller. Is this the interpretation one should give to R?

The thing that confuse me more is the fact that R=0 doesn't imply a flat manifold.
 
The thing that confuse me more is the fact that R=0 doesn't imply a flat manifold.
Yes, it's not very intuitive. To get a flat spacetime all the Christoffel symbols ( connections) have to disappear.
 
Mentz114 said:
Yes, it's not very intuitive. To get a flat spacetime all the Christoffel symbols ( connections) have to disappear.

I agree that the issue of interpretation is not very intuitive...
but I hope there is a good interpretation to be found.Note that: in the plane, the Christoffel symbols for the polar coordinates are all not zero.

A flat space requires the Riemann Tensor to be zero (which can be formed from the Christoffel symbols and their derivatives). The scalar curvature is of course formed from the traces of Riemann.Possibly interesting reading: http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0103044

Note also that the curvature scalar is featured in the action for GR.
 
robphy,
so, both the plane in polar coords(PP), and the Schwarzschild metric have zero R and non-zero Christoffel symbols. How do we tell if either is curved ?

I notice that all the Ricci components are zero for both, but there are non-zero Riemann components for Schwarzschild, but not for PP.

M
 
Mentz114 said:
robphy,
so, both the plane in polar coords(PP), and the Schwarzschild metric have zero R and non-zero Christoffel symbols. How do we tell if either is curved ?

I notice that all the Ricci components are zero for both, but there are non-zero Riemann components for Schwarzschild, but not for PP.

M

As suggested in my earlier post [and as you have done for your examples], compute the Riemann curvature tensor.
 
OK, so space-time is curved if there are tidal effects. Thanks for clearing that up.
 
  • #10
Just to add a little, the Ricci scalar is one of many curvature scalars that can be written down using the Riemann tensor. Einstein's equation tells you exactly what R is at every point. It always vanishes in vacuum, for example. The other curvature scalars do not necessarily have this behavior. Any one of them being nonzero tells you that the spacetime is curved. The reverse is not true, however. There are curved spacetimes (describing plane gravitational waves) where all standard curvature scalars vanish. The Riemann tensor still manages to be nonzero in these cases. There is therefore curvature.
 
  • #11
Mentz114 said:
Yes, it's not very intuitive. To get a flat spacetime all the Christoffel symbols ( connections) have to disappear.
A vanishing Ricci tensor doesn't even imply a flat spacetime. In fact the Ricci tensor vanishes in the vacuum of a Schwarzschild spacetime.

Note - It should be noted that all of the components of the affine connection vanishing only means that you have a locally flat coordinate system. It does not mean that the spacetime is flat. This if a very important distinction.

Pete
 
  • #12
Mentz114 said:
OK, so space-time is curved if there are tidal effects. Thanks for clearing that up.
Exactly. In fact the terms spacetime curvature and tidal gravity are exactly the same two things but described in different languages.

Pete
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K