Meaning of Independent Identically distributed random variables

Click For Summary
Independent Identically Distributed (IID) random variables are those that are both independent and share the same probability distribution. The term "identically distributed" implies that they have the same probability density function (pdf) and cumulative distribution function (cdf), which also means they possess the same mean and variance. In the example provided, the random variables N(0,1), N(2,4), and N(3,5) are independent but not identically distributed due to differing parameters, thus they are not IID. The key takeaway is that while independence is necessary, identical distribution is crucial for the IID classification. Therefore, for random variables to be considered IID, they must have identical statistical properties.
dionysian
Messages
51
Reaction score
1
I am a little fuzzy on the meaning of Independent Identically distributed random variables. I understand the independent part but still not 100% on the identically distributed part. I understand that identically distributed means they have the same pdf and cdf but does this mean that they have the same mean and variance?

For example if i have a sequence of random variables: N(0,1),N(2,4),N(3,5) and they are all independent are they IID?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


If they have the same pdf, then they by definition have the same mean and variance.
 


For example if i have a sequence of random variables: N(0,1),N(2,4),N(3,5) and they are all independent are they IID?
They are all normal, but since the parameters are different, the distribution functions are different. (Not IID, only I).
 
Last edited:


Thanks.
 
The standard _A " operator" maps a Null Hypothesis Ho into a decision set { Do not reject:=1 and reject :=0}. In this sense ( HA)_A , makes no sense. Since H0, HA aren't exhaustive, can we find an alternative operator, _A' , so that ( H_A)_A' makes sense? Isn't Pearson Neyman related to this? Hope I'm making sense. Edit: I was motivated by a superficial similarity of the idea with double transposition of matrices M, with ## (M^{T})^{T}=M##, and just wanted to see if it made sense to talk...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
6K