Measurability and integration of set-valued maps

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter moh salem
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integration
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the distinctions between measurable set-valued maps and measurable single-valued maps, as well as integrable set-valued maps versus integrable single-valued maps. A set-valued map, defined as a function from a set X to the power set P(Y), differs fundamentally from a single-valued map, which maps points from X to Y. The definitions of measurability and integrability are crucial, as they apply differently to set-to-set functions and point-to-point functions. The conversation emphasizes the need for clarity in these definitions to avoid confusion in mathematical applications.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of set theory and functions
  • Familiarity with measurable functions in mathematics
  • Knowledge of integrability concepts in analysis
  • Basic comprehension of power sets and their properties
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of measurable functions in the context of set-valued analysis
  • Explore the concept of integrability for set-valued maps
  • Learn about the applications of set-valued maps in optimization problems
  • Investigate examples of measurable and integrable functions in real analysis
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, researchers in functional analysis, and students studying advanced calculus or measure theory will benefit from this discussion.

moh salem
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
What is the difference between the measurable set-valued maps and measurable single-valued map?
What is the difference between the integrable set-valued maps and integrable single-valued map?
With illustrative examples, if possible?
Thank you very.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I am not sure what you are trying to get at. A set value map is a function of sets while a single value map is a function of points.
 
I mean from the first paragraph is to:
Let \text{ }F:X\longrightarrow P(Y) \text{ }be \text{ }a \text{ }set-valued \text{ }map \text{ }and \text{ } f:X\longrightarrow Y \text{ }be \text{ }a \text{ }measurable\\ \text{ }single-valued \text{ }map, \text{ }where \text{ } F(x)=\{f(x)\}.\\ Is \text{ }F \text{ }be \text{ }a \text{ }measurable. \text{ }And \text{ }do \text{ }the \text{ }conversely \text{ }is \text{ }true .​
 
I am confused about the definition of F. It looks like it is defined for points of X and the images are points of Y considered as one point sets {f(x)} rather than the point itself f(x).
 
Definition(set-valued map):
Let X and Y be two nonempty sets and P(Y)={A:A⊆Y,A≠φ}. A set-valued map is a map F:X→P(Y) i.e. ∀x∈X, F(x)⊆Y
for examples,
(1) Let F:ℝ→P(ℝ) s.t. F(x)=]α,∞[,∀x∈X. Then F is a set-valued map.
(2) Let F:ℝ→P(ℝ²) s.t. F(x)={(x,y):y=αx, α∈ℝ}.Then F is a set-valued map.
(3) Let f:ℝ→ℝ be a single-valued map defined by f(x)=x². Then F:ℝ→P(ℝ) defined by F(x)=f⁻¹(x) is a set-valued map.
 
To answer your original question: The definitions of measurability and integrability need to be defined for set to set functions and for point to point functions. The differences are intrinsic in that they refer to different objects.

In my experience, measure is a set function, but integrability refers to point functions.
 
Thanks mathman.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K