Measurability and integration of set-valued maps

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter moh salem
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integration
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the differences between measurable set-valued maps and measurable single-valued maps, as well as the distinctions between integrable set-valued maps and integrable single-valued maps. Participants explore definitions, examples, and the implications of these concepts in the context of measure theory and integration.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the intent behind the original question, noting that set-valued maps function on sets while single-valued maps function on points.
  • Another participant clarifies that a set-valued map can be defined as a function from a set X to the power set of Y, providing examples to illustrate this concept.
  • There is a discussion about whether a set-valued map F is measurable if it is defined in terms of a measurable single-valued map f, with some participants seeking to understand the implications of this relationship.
  • Confusion arises regarding the definition of F, particularly in how it relates to points in X and their images in Y, with some participants expressing uncertainty about the notation used.
  • One participant emphasizes that the definitions of measurability and integrability must be considered for both set-to-set functions and point-to-point functions, suggesting that the differences are inherent to the objects being discussed.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying levels of understanding regarding the definitions and implications of set-valued versus single-valued maps. There is no consensus on the clarity of these definitions, and the discussion remains unresolved with respect to the original questions posed.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight potential ambiguities in definitions and notation, particularly regarding the relationship between set-valued maps and single-valued maps. The discussion reflects a need for clearer definitions and examples to fully address the questions raised.

moh salem
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
What is the difference between the measurable set-valued maps and measurable single-valued map?
What is the difference between the integrable set-valued maps and integrable single-valued map?
With illustrative examples, if possible?
Thank you very.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I am not sure what you are trying to get at. A set value map is a function of sets while a single value map is a function of points.
 
I mean from the first paragraph is to:
Let \text{ }F:X\longrightarrow P(Y) \text{ }be \text{ }a \text{ }set-valued \text{ }map \text{ }and \text{ } f:X\longrightarrow Y \text{ }be \text{ }a \text{ }measurable\\ \text{ }single-valued \text{ }map, \text{ }where \text{ } F(x)=\{f(x)\}.\\ Is \text{ }F \text{ }be \text{ }a \text{ }measurable. \text{ }And \text{ }do \text{ }the \text{ }conversely \text{ }is \text{ }true .​
 
I am confused about the definition of F. It looks like it is defined for points of X and the images are points of Y considered as one point sets {f(x)} rather than the point itself f(x).
 
Definition(set-valued map):
Let X and Y be two nonempty sets and P(Y)={A:A⊆Y,A≠φ}. A set-valued map is a map F:X→P(Y) i.e. ∀x∈X, F(x)⊆Y
for examples,
(1) Let F:ℝ→P(ℝ) s.t. F(x)=]α,∞[,∀x∈X. Then F is a set-valued map.
(2) Let F:ℝ→P(ℝ²) s.t. F(x)={(x,y):y=αx, α∈ℝ}.Then F is a set-valued map.
(3) Let f:ℝ→ℝ be a single-valued map defined by f(x)=x². Then F:ℝ→P(ℝ) defined by F(x)=f⁻¹(x) is a set-valued map.
 
To answer your original question: The definitions of measurability and integrability need to be defined for set to set functions and for point to point functions. The differences are intrinsic in that they refer to different objects.

In my experience, measure is a set function, but integrability refers to point functions.
 
Thanks mathman.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K