Measuring LVDS Signal - Single Ended Probes & Oscilloscope?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mariam.f
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Measuring Signal
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

To measure a Low-Voltage Differential Signaling (LVDS) signal using an oscilloscope, utilize two single-ended probes with a 100-ohm resistor connected between them. Attach one probe to the signal-p and the other to the signal-n, and configure the oscilloscope to display the difference between the two signals. If measuring low voltage levels, consider using an amplifier or consult the sensor manufacturer for specific requirements. This method allows for effective visualization of the LVDS signal without needing expensive differential probes.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Low-Voltage Differential Signaling (LVDS)
  • Familiarity with oscilloscope operation and settings
  • Knowledge of impedance matching techniques
  • Basic electronics concepts, including resistors and op-amp circuits
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the specifications and recommendations from the LVDS sensor manufacturer
  • Learn about oscilloscope differential measurement techniques
  • Explore the use of operational amplifiers for signal processing
  • Investigate impedance matching methods for high-frequency signals
USEFUL FOR

Electronics engineers, technicians measuring LVDS signals, and anyone involved in high-speed digital signal analysis.

mariam.f
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello
I would like to measure a LVDS signal, on the board that is sending this signal. There are two signal pins on this board for this signal, signal-p and signal-n. How can I measure this signal? Can I use single ended probes and an oscilliscope? I tried to do that but I can't find a signal. Am I making a mistake in measuring this way (what if so?) I don't have differential probes and they are expensive, is there another way?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Hello mariam.f. Welcome to the forum.

It might help to have some context. What is LVDS? What sort of voltage and current are you anticipating? What sort of frequency or rate of change in signal are you anticipating?

Probably what you want to do is Google up the maker of the sensor and find out what they suggest for getting the signal collected.

If you are talking about a "few" volts with frequencies up to a few mega-hertz you may get good results with an oscilloscope. You may need to put in some resistors to match impedance to get a good signal. The usual situation for a scope is a very high resistance across the leads. This may not be suitable for the kind of sensor you are using. Maybe what you need to do is put a resistor across the leads of the scope to balance things. If you have a high-end scope you may be able to coax it to collect and store the data for you.

If you are talking about milli-volts the scope may, or may not, let you go that low. You might need an amplifier. You might need a power source going through the sensor. Before you start guessing, you almost certainly need that info from the maker of the sensor.
 
Use two single ended probes with a 100 ohm resistor between them (one side of the resistor connected to each to probes). Attach one probe to signal-p and the other to signal-n. Then, in your oscilloscope, set the readout for the difference between the probes (may be called A-B or DIFF, it depends on different scopes). Then you should see your signal.
 
Don't use the 100 ohm resistor if you are measuring with a terminated LVDS receiver already attached. But, otherwise analogdesign is correct.

Basically measure each signal with respect to ground and subtract them, either visually (which I do most often) or with "scope math".
 
One possibility is to build a simple op-amp circuit that will take the difference between the two signals (p and n) but if your scope will take the difference for you then analogdesign's suggestion is the best.
 
Again, no reason to subtract them in the scope or an opamp. I find it is actually more meaningful to look at the two signals single ended with the scope trace grounds overlayed. That way you see what each line is doing, and it is easy to subtract them visually.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: leright

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
37
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
565
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
5K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K