Measuring off target mutations during CRISPR gene editing

In summary: So, the new study found that the classic CRISPR method and one type of base editor that can change A-T base pairs to C-G base pairs essentially introduced no detectable off target mutations (the number of new mutations found in the edited cells was indistinguishable from the number of new mutations found in the unedited cells). However, they detected a much higher off target mutation rate for another type of base editor (which changes C-G base pairs to A-T base pairs).The study in rice (which only compared the two types of base editors) found similar results.In summary, the new study found that CRISPR–Cas9 caused unexpected off-target changes in mice, but that some newer
  • #1
Ygggdrasil
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Gold Member
3,759
4,199
https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/dont-fear-https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/dont-fear-crispr-new-gene-editing-technologies-wont-lead-designer-babies/-new-gene-editing-technologies-wont-lead-designer-babies/ is a newly developed tool that allows researchers to easily make changes to an organism's DNA. There is much interest in using this technology in clinical applications, but there have been https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/scientists-identify-major-safety-issue-with-https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/dont-fear-crispr-new-gene-editing-technologies-wont-lead-designer-babies/.949415/surrounding the safety of the technology, including whether the gene editing approach leads to https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/dont-fear-crispr-new-gene-editing-technologies-wont-lead-designer-babies/-and-unwanted-dna-alterations.951623/ elsewhere in the genome. Today, two independent teams of researchers developed methods to measure the rate of off target mutations due to CRISPR gene editing and published their results in the journal Science. One team studied the question in mice and another team studied the question in rice, and the two studies came to largely the same conclusions.

The study in mice took embryos that had undergone a single cell division, at which point the embryo consists of only two cells. In once cell, they injected the reagents for CRISPR gene editing along with a marker that would color the cells red, while they left the other cell untreated. After the embryo had developed for a few days, they could then take the embryo, disassociate the cells, sort the red (edited) cells from the uncolored (non-edited) cells, then perform DNA sequencing to detect mutations in each population of cells.

They tested various different CRISPR variants, including thehttps://www.physicsforums.com/insights/dont-fear-https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/dont-fear-crispr-new-gene-editing-technologies-wont-lead-designer-babies/-new-gene-editing-technologies-wont-lead-designer-babies/ (which cuts the DNA to introduce errors during repair of the DNA) or https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/dont-fear-crispr-new-gene-editing-technologies-wont-lead-designer-babies/-based-base-changes.930803/(which directly change DNA base pairs without cutting the DNA). They found that the classic CRISPR method and one type of base editor that can change A-T base pairs to C-G base pairs essentially introduced no detectable off target mutations (the number of new mutations found in the edited cells was indistinguishable from the number of new mutations found in the unedited cells). However, they detected a much higher off target mutation rate for another type of base editor (which changes C-G base pairs to A-T base pairs). The study in rice (which only compared the two types of base editors) found similar results.

The studies indicate that, when correctly deployed, some CRISPR methods can be used for gene editing with minimal risk of off target mutations, and indicated how improvements can be made to some newer base editing technologies (as the C-G base editor was only invented a few years ago, it is likely that improved versions can be developed).

Zuo et al. Cytosine base editor generates substantial off-target single-nucleotide variants in mouse embryos. Science. Published online 28 Feb 2019. http://science.sciencemag.org/content/early/2019/02/27/science.aav9973

Jin et al. Cytosine, but not adenine, base editors induce genome-wide off-target mutations in rice. Science. Published online 28 Feb 2019. http://science.sciencemag.org/content/early/2019/02/27/science.aaw7166

Popular press coverage: https://www.wired.com/story/precise-gene-editing-is-trickier-than-expected-but-fixes-are-in-sight/
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes atyy, jim mcnamara, pinball1970 and 3 others
Biology news on Phys.org
  • #2
Where did the large number of off-target mutations reported from classic CRISPR before came from then?
 
  • Like
Likes atyy
  • #3
mfb said:
Where did the large number of off-target mutations reported from classic CRISPR before came from then?

In 2017, Nature Methods published a peer-reviewed paper (Schaefer et al.) in which the authors reported that CRISPR–Cas9 caused unexpected off-target changes in mice. Since its publication, we have been contacted by many scientists challenging this work. Five of these critiques are now published, as peer-reviewed Correspondences, in this issue.

As the authors of these critiques point out, and as confirmed by four independent referees who evaluated both the critiques and the original authors' response to them, the study by Schaefer et al. lacked key controls so that it is not possible to ascribe the observed genomic variants, with reasonable confidence, to CRISPR. The paper has now been retracted to maintain the accuracy of the published record.
https://www.nature.com/articles/nmeth.4664

In particular, the retracted paper examined only two gene edited animals, and as a reference, sequenced the DNA of one animal of the same strain. The choice of reference is problematic because there is extensive variation in the DNA even between individuals of the same inbred mouse strain, and it is likely that many of the mutations that the authors of the 2017 study detected were due to this intrinsic variation.

In contrast, the new method uses cells from the same embryo as the reference, which eliminates issues with inter-individual variation. Mutations can also arise spontaneously throughout the course of embryonic development, but the authors of the new study performed careful controls to measure the rate of spontaneous mutation so that they could accurately measure the excess mutations due to gene editing.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes atyy and mfb

1. What is CRISPR gene editing?

CRISPR gene editing is a technique used by scientists to make precise changes to an organism's DNA. It involves using a guide RNA to target a specific sequence of DNA and then using an enzyme called Cas9 to cut the DNA at that location. This allows for the addition, removal, or modification of specific genes.

2. How do scientists measure off target mutations during CRISPR gene editing?

There are several methods that scientists use to measure off target mutations during CRISPR gene editing. These include next-generation sequencing, PCR-based assays, and DNA mismatch detection assays. These techniques allow scientists to identify any unintended changes to the DNA that may have occurred during the editing process.

3. Why is it important to measure off target mutations during CRISPR gene editing?

It is important to measure off target mutations during CRISPR gene editing because these unintended changes to the DNA can have unintended consequences. They may lead to genetic disorders or other negative effects on the organism. By measuring these mutations, scientists can ensure the safety and accuracy of the editing process.

4. What are the potential risks of off target mutations during CRISPR gene editing?

The potential risks of off target mutations during CRISPR gene editing include unintended changes to the DNA that may lead to genetic disorders or other negative effects on the organism. These mutations may also affect neighboring genes and disrupt their function. Additionally, off target mutations may also lead to unintended changes in gene expression, which can have a significant impact on the organism.

5. How can scientists minimize off target mutations during CRISPR gene editing?

To minimize off target mutations during CRISPR gene editing, scientists can use bioinformatics tools to design highly specific guide RNAs. They can also use modified versions of the Cas9 enzyme that have a lower likelihood of causing off target mutations. Additionally, performing thorough and comprehensive analysis of the edited DNA can help identify and minimize any off target mutations that may have occurred.

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
3K
  • Biology and Medical
Replies
2
Views
979
  • Biology and Medical
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • Biology and Medical
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • Biology and Medical
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • Biology and Medical
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Biology and Medical
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
764
Back
Top