Measuring the speed of the moon

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the speed of the moon as it orbits Earth, specifically at a distance of 3.84 × 10^5 km. Participants are exploring kinematic equations and gravitational relationships to derive the moon's orbital speed.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants attempt various equations, including kinematic and gravitational formulas, to find the moon's speed. Questions arise regarding the validity of their approaches and the simplifications made in their calculations.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided feedback on the calculations, pointing out potential errors and ambiguities in the equations used. There is ongoing exploration of different equations, with some participants expressing confusion about the results and the terminology used in the discussion.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of homework guidelines, which may limit the information they can share or the methods they can use. There is also mention of the moon's elliptical orbit, though simplifications to a circular model are being considered.

bobsmith76
Messages
336
Reaction score
0
I tried 5 times to get this problem, so I'm sort of heavily invested in it.

Homework Statement



How fast is the moon moving as it orbits Earth at a distance of 3.84 × 10^5 km?

Homework Equations



I'm using the kinematic equation: v = Δd/Δt

Here distance will be 2∏r (I know that the moon's orbit is elliptical but I think my textbook is simplifying to circular)

So that equation will come to:

2. v = (2∏r)/ΔtI then use the Kepler equation:

(G * M)/r = (4∏2r2)/T2

I put the equation in terms of T, this is probably where I messed up:

3. √((G*M)/4∏2r3

I then divide equation 2 by 3

M = mass of Earth or 5.98 * 1024
r = radius of Moon's orbit 3.84 *108

The Attempt at a Solution



When you plug in all the numbers, you get the following equation seen at this screen shot using this calculator

http://web2.0calc.com/
Screenshot2012-01-11at33406AM.png


That number comes to 5.7 * 10^15

The correct answer is 1.02 * 10^3
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ok, I tried another strategy.

I used this equation

(G*M1M2)/r2=(M2v2)/r

which simplifies to

√((G * M1)/r) = v

And I got .052 which is closer to 1030 m/s but not quite.
 
Show that calculation in detail. I get the given result.


ehild
 
Thanks for your help but your answer is a little vague. Does given result refer to my answer on the first thread, second thread or the answer supplied by the book? As for calculation does that refer to my first calculation or second?

In any case, I've found the answer with a new equation

v = ((2πGM)/T)1/3

But I would like to know why those two equations that I tried first do not work.
 
bobsmith76 said:
But I would like to know why those two equations that I tried first do not work.

The formula 3 in your first post was not an equation, and I did not understand what you wrote in the spoiler.

ehild
 
Last edited:
there are some errors in the 3rd equation but based on the image i have posted you should be able to figure it out.

i don't know what a spoiler is.
 
bobsmith76 said:
Thanks for your help but your answer is a little vague. Does given result refer to my answer on the first thread, second thread or the answer supplied by the book? As for calculation does that refer to my first calculation or second?

In any case, I've found the answer with a new equation

v = ((2πGM)/T)1/3

But I would like to know why those two equations that I tried first do not work.
Using √((G * M1)/r) = v , I get v = 1.019×103 m/s .

In your original post, if you divide equation 2 by equation 3 (What you have for (3) is not an equation. No '=' sign.) you are finding v/t. That's not velocity.

If you look carefully at what you have for "equation" 3, you have solved for 1/T, not T.

The expression in your screen shot can be greatly simplified and is actually equal to 1/v .
 
Hi Sammy,

Thanks for your help
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
1K