Measuring the Volume of a Cup: A Scientific Analysis

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter cp3themvp
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Volume
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around methods for measuring the volume of a cup, specifically whether to submerge the cup in water or to measure the change in water level when the cup is held at the water line. Participants explore the implications of each method and the definitions of volume involved.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants argue that submerging the cup in water accurately measures the volume of the cup itself, while others suggest that measuring the change in water level when the cup is held at the water line includes the volume of air inside the cup.
  • A participant highlights the need to clarify whether the volume in question refers to the volume of fluid the cup can hold or the volume of the material that composes the cup.
  • Another participant proposes that the method suggested by the OP's friend could be interpreted as measuring the sum of both the volume of the material and the volume of fluid the cup can hold, which may be relevant for specific applications.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the best method for measuring the volume of the cup, and multiple competing views remain regarding the definitions and implications of volume in this context.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the definitions of volume can vary based on context, and the discussion highlights the importance of specifying which volume is being measured to avoid confusion.

cp3themvp
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
If I submerge a cup in a graduated cylinder filled with water, will the change of the water line show me the volume of the cup? Or is this not the case?

I am in an argument with a friend, he believes that the volume of the cup could be found by holding the top of the cup right about the water line(in other words, not allowing any water to enter to the cup) and then measuring the change of the water line. I argued that if one uses this method of measurement, that the change in the water line now includes the volume of the air that is inside of the cup.

The scientific definition of volume I found is the amount of space an object takes up. In the 1st experiment I proposed, I believe this finds the amount of space the cup takes up. In the 2nd experiment, I believe this finds the amount of space the cup takes up+the amount of space the air inside of the cup takes up. Am I correct, or is the 2nd experiment actually the correct method for measuring the volume of a cup?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are right, drown the cup. There is a famous story about this experiment:
http://www.longlongtimeago.com/once-upon-a-time/great-discoveries/eureka-the-story-of-archimedes-and-the-golden-crown/
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: anorlunda
cp3themvp said:
I am in an argument with a friend, he believes that the volume of the cup could be found by holding the top of the cup right about the water line(in other words, not allowing any water to enter to the cup) and then measuring the change of the water line. I argued that if one uses this method of measurement, that the change in the water line now includes the volume of the air that is inside of the cup.

The scientific definition of volume I found is the amount of space an object takes up. In the 1st experiment I proposed, I believe this finds the amount of space the cup takes up. In the 2nd experiment, I believe this finds the amount of space the cup takes up+the amount of space the air inside of the cup takes up. Am I correct, or is the 2nd experiment actually the correct method for measuring the volume of a cup?

This is an issue of wording. By 'volume of the cup' do you two mean the volume of fluid that the cup can hold? Or do you mean the volume of the material composing the cup? The former would require that you just fill the cup with fluid and pour it into a graduated cylinder. The latter is found by submerging the entire cup, not just submerge it until the water reaches the rim.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: davenn
cp3themvp said:
The scientific definition of volume...
Don't waste your time on arguing about definitions. Just clarify which volume you both mean and use qualifiers to distinguish them. It depends on the application which volume is the relevant one.
 
cp3themvp said:
If I submerge a cup in a graduated cylinder filled with water, will the change of the water line show me the volume of the cup? Or is this not the case?

I am in an argument with a friend, he believes that the volume of the cup could be found by holding the top of the cup right about the water line(in other words, not allowing any water to enter to the cup) and then measuring the change of the water line. I argued that if one uses this method of measurement, that the change in the water line now includes the volume of the air that is inside of the cup.

The scientific definition of volume I found is the amount of space an object takes up. In the 1st experiment I proposed, I believe this finds the amount of space the cup takes up. In the 2nd experiment, I believe this finds the amount of space the cup takes up+the amount of space the air inside of the cup takes up. Am I correct, or is the 2nd experiment actually the correct method for measuring the volume of a cup?

This can easily be clarified by specifying if you want the volume of the MATERIAL that forms the cup, or do you want the volume that the cup can hold.

These are two different definitions and give two different volumes.

By submerging the cup in water and making sure that there are no air pockets, you are measuring the volume of material that forms the cup. By filling the cup up to the brim with water and then measuring that volume of water, you are measuring the volume that the cup can hold.

Zz.
 
ZapperZ said:
This can easily be clarified by specifying if you want the volume of the MATERIAL that forms the cup, or do you want the volume that the cup can hold.
I think the method suggested by the OP's friend is a third variant: the sum of the two volumes above. This would be relevant if you plan to use the cup as a boat, and want know its maximal displacement.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 94 ·
4
Replies
94
Views
9K
  • · Replies 131 ·
5
Replies
131
Views
9K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
7K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K