Mechanical Energy of two Cannonballs fired at two different angles

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the mechanical energy of two cannonballs fired at different angles, specifically focusing on their potential and kinetic energy at the highest points of their trajectories.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between potential energy (PE) and kinetic energy (KE) at the highest point of the trajectories, questioning whether KE is zero at that point. They discuss the horizontal components of velocity and how they contribute to KE.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the concepts of mechanical energy, potential energy, and kinetic energy. Some have provided insights into the definitions and relationships between these energies, while others are questioning assumptions about energy conservation and the contributions of different components of velocity.

Contextual Notes

There is an ongoing discussion about the assumptions regarding kinetic energy at the highest point of the trajectories, as well as the implications of energy conservation in the context of the problem.

Mustard
Messages
21
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
A 20.0-kg cannonball is fired from a cannon with muzzle speed of 1,000 m/s at an angle of 37.0 degrees with the horizontal. A second ball is fired at an angle of 90.0 degrees. Use the isolated system model to find (a) the maximum height reached by each ball and (b) the total mechanical energy of the ball–Earth system at the maximum height for each ball. Let y=0 at the cannon.
Relevant Equations
ME = PE + KE
I solved for both heights: h1 = (1.85x10^4)m, h2 = (5.10 x 10^4)m

Question is knowing ME = PE + KE for ball at h1 (angled 37 degrees), is it safe to assume there would be no KE as velocity would equal zero at the highest point? So the mechanical energy = mgh ? Would it be the same for ball at h2?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What are the horizontal components of velocity of each ball at the highest points in their trajectory? Hint: Draw a diagram of each trajectory and draw on the velocity vector at the highest point.
 
etotheipi said:
What are the horizontal components of velocity of each ball at the highest points in their trajectory? Hint: Draw a diagram of each trajectory and draw on the velocity vector at the highest point.
By horizontal components do you mean Vx? For the first it would be Vx=1000(cos37degrees), 2nd ball would not have a Vx component?
 
Mustard said:
By horizontal components do you mean Vx? For the first it would be Vx=1000(cos37degrees), 2nd ball would not have a Vx component?

Right, yes. So what's the kinetic energy of each at the highest point in the trajectory?
 
etotheipi said:
Right, yes. So what's the kinetic energy of each at the highest point in the trajectory?
Hmmm, conceptually...I am having a hard time grasping why wouldn't kinetic energy be equal zero at the highest point since velocity would be zero?

But for the first ball, it won't have kinetic energy in the y-direction but it would have kinetic energy in the x-direction?
KEx=0.5(20)(Vx)^2​
For the 2nd ball, if we continue this train of thought it would be no KE in x-direction and KE in y-direction:
KEy=0.5(20)(1000)^2​
 
The kinetic energy of a body is defined as ##T = \frac{1}{2}m(\vec{v} \cdot \vec{v}) = \frac{1}{2}mv^2 = \frac{1}{2}m({v_x}^2 + {v_y}^{2}) = \frac{1}{2}m{v_x}^2 + \frac{1}{2}m{v_y}^2##.

You can then in a sense treat the kinetic energy in both directions separately. All that you need to do is find ##v_x## and ##v_y## at the top of the motion. You already know that ##v_y = 0## at the top of the trajectory since you used this fact to determine the heights. And in post #3 you worked out the horizontal components, ##v_x##.

So what are the kinetic energies of each?
 
etotheipi said:
The kinetic energy of a body is defined as ##T = \frac{1}{2}m(\vec{v} \cdot \vec{v}) = \frac{1}{2}mv^2 = \frac{1}{2}m({v_x}^2 + {v_y}^{2}) = \frac{1}{2}m{v_x}^2 + \frac{1}{2}m{v_y}^2##.

You can then in a sense treat the kinetic energy in both directions separately. All that you need to do is find ##v_x## and ##v_y## at the top of the motion. You already know that ##v_y = 0## at the top of the trajectory since you used this fact to determine the heights. And in post #3 you worked out the horizontal components, ##v_x##.

So what are the kinetic energies of each?
Ohhh! So KE for ball 1 = 0.5(20)(Vx)^2 , 2nd ball would not have KE. So told solve for ME for ball one would be:
ME = KE
*No PE since there is KE?*​
Solving for ME for ball two would be:
ME = PE​
 
Mustard said:
So told solve for ME for ball one would be:
ME = KE
*No PE since there is KE?*​

The Earth-ball system definitely still has PE! It's just it also has KE too.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Mustard
etotheipi said:
The Earth-ball system definitely still has PE! It's just it also has KE too.
Hmmm, I think I got it! ME for both are equal around 10,000,000 J. Thank you very much, I appreciate you!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: etotheipi
  • #10
Mustard said:
Hmmm, I think I got it! ME for both are equal around 10,000,000 J. Thank you very much, I appreciate you!

Note that mechanical energy is conserved in these scenarios, which means it is constant over time, and depends only on the mass and initial muzzle velocity.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: etotheipi

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K