Not sure how to plug in numbers for Work Energy Theorem

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the Work Energy Theorem in the context of a crate sliding down a ramp. The problem involves calculating the kinetic energy of a crate, given its mass, the distance it slides, the angle of the ramp, and the force of kinetic friction acting on it.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the calculation of potential energy and the impact of kinetic friction on the energy of the crate. Questions arise about how to incorporate the work done by friction into the energy considerations and the relevant equations needed for this analysis.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively exploring the relationship between work, force, and distance, with some providing equations related to work. There is a recognition of the energy lost to friction and its implications for the final energy of the crate. Multiple interpretations of the work-energy theorem and its application are being discussed.

Contextual Notes

There is some uncertainty regarding the direction of forces and displacement, as well as the proper application of the work-energy theorem in this scenario. Participants are navigating through these complexities without reaching a definitive conclusion.

CiCi
Messages
5
Reaction score
1
1. The Problem Stament, all variables and given data

a 15 kg crate, initially at rest, slides down a ramp 2.0 m long and inclined at an angle of 20 degrees with the horizontal. if there is a constant force of kinetic friction of 25 N between the crate and ramp, what kinetic energy would the crate have at the bottom of the ramp?

2. Needed equations

Work = PE + KE + Energy Lost
PE= mgh
Height = Sinθ * Length
KE= (1/2) m*v^2

3. Attempt at solution

okay so I know how to start out with finding PE

PE= mass* gravity* height = 15 * 9.8 * height

Find Height
Height= Sin (20°) * 2.0= .684

PE= 15 * 9.8 * .684 = 100.5 Joules

What's throwing me off is the kinetic friction of 25 N, I'm not sure what to do with it and where to plug it into to
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How can you include the work done by the friction into your energy considerations?
 
Orodruin said:
How can you include the work done by the friction into your energy considerations?
Is there another equation I need? Because I'm not sure
 
What equation relates force and distance to work?
 
CWatters said:
What equation relates force and distance to work?
Force = distance / time ?
 
I said force, distance and work.
(Not time)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Bystander
CWatters said:
I said force, distance and work.
(Not time)
Work = force * distance ?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: CWatters
That's the one.
 
CWatters said:
That's the one.
So
Work = 25 N * 2.0 m
= 50 Joules
What does this do?
 
  • #10
That describes the amount of energy lost to friction. You know that this is the only way energy is lost during the motion of the object. Therefore you can say that the final energy of the box will be the initial energy minus the energy lost to friction.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: CWatters
  • #11
+1

You have a system where energy changes from PE to KE and heat. Apply the relevant equation you posted that invokes conservation of energy.
 
  • #12
CiCi said:
Work = force * distance ?
It's more than that.
For a constant force, the work is given by ##W=Fd\cos \theta##, where ##F## = magnitude of the force, ##d## = magnitude of the displacement and ##\theta## = angle between force vector and displacement vector. Work is "force times distance" only if the force and the displacement are in the same direction. This is not the case here.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: CWatters
  • #13
kuruman said:
It's more than that.
For a constant force, the work is given by ##W=Fd\cos \theta##, where ##F## = magnitude of the force, ##d## = magnitude of the displacement and ##\theta## = angle between force vector and displacement vector. Work is "force times distance" only if the force and the displacement are in the same direction. This is not the case here.
That's correct but I hope it doesn't confuse cici. In this case the force and displacement arent in the same direction but are parallel so trig isn't really needed to solve.
 
  • #14
CWatters said:
That's correct but I hope it doesn't confuse cici. In this case the force and displacement arent in the same direction but are parallel so trig isn't really needed to solve.
Well, the title of the thread mentions use of the work-energy theorem which implies calculation of the sum of all the works. None of the acting forces (gravity, friction and normal force) are in the direction of the displacement. I hope @CiCi does not get confused either, but he has to understand how the more general definition of work is implemented.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: CWatters

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
3K
Replies
44
Views
7K