Solid sphere rolling along a track

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a solid sphere rolling along a track and the conservation of energy principles involved in its motion. Participants are examining the relationship between kinetic energy, gravitational potential energy, and the effects of rotation on the sphere's height after leaving the track.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to verify their reasoning regarding energy conservation and the height of the sphere after it leaves the track. Some participants question whether the sphere will continue to rotate after leaving the track and how this affects its kinetic energy and potential energy.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging in clarifying concepts related to the problem. There is a recognition of the implications of rotational motion on energy conservation, and some guidance has been provided regarding the relationship between kinetic energy and height.

Contextual Notes

There is a lack of an answer key, and participants are working through assumptions about the sphere's motion and energy states. The original poster's understanding of energy conservation is being challenged and refined through the discussion.

JessicaHelena
Messages
188
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


Please see the attached file.

Homework Equations


Ei = Ef

The Attempt at a Solution


I don't have an answer key provided, but I'd really like to verify that I'm right (or if I'm wrong, why). I think ti'd be (c) because assuming that due to inertia, B will continue going straight up (even though gravity will decelerate its motion). When it finally stops moving, it will have 0 KE, but assuming the energy is conserved, it should have the same amount of mechanical energy as it did in A. Since at A, the ball had only gravitational potential energy (mgh), at its highest point in air, it too should have mgh and thus the same height as point A.

Would that be right?
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2018-11-17 at 6.22.42 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2018-11-17 at 6.22.42 PM.png
    15 KB · Views: 576
Physics news on Phys.org
No, it would not be right. Will the ball be rotating after it leaves the track?
 
@Chestermiller — ah, it'd keep rotating even when it's stopped moving vertically, and so with less KE available "initially", the mgh will be less as well and thus the height will be less than the original height. Is that better?
 
JessicaHelena said:
@Chestermiller — ah, it'd keep rotating even when it's stopped moving vertically, and so with less KE available "initially", the mgh will be less as well and thus the height will be less than the original height. Is that better?
If I understand you correctly, yes.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: JessicaHelena

Similar threads

  • · Replies 97 ·
4
Replies
97
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K