(Mechanics) A Plank in a Circular Trough

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion revolves around solving a physics problem from Richard P. Feynman's "Tips on Physics," specifically problem I-5, which involves calculating the angle a plank makes with the horizontal while resting in a circular trough. The user initially attempted to apply equilibrium tactics using normal forces and gravity but encountered difficulties due to the circular geometry. Key insights include the necessity of using torque and force equations, particularly the sum of torques and horizontal forces, to derive the correct angle. The correct center of mass calculation is crucial, with the final answer being 30 degrees.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of torque and force equations in physics
  • Familiarity with center of mass calculations
  • Knowledge of equilibrium conditions in mechanics
  • Basic trigonometry related to angles and forces
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of torque and equilibrium in circular motion
  • Learn about center of mass calculations for composite systems
  • Explore advanced trigonometric applications in physics problems
  • Review Feynman's "Tips on Physics" for additional context and examples
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those tackling mechanics problems involving forces and torques, as well as educators looking for problem-solving strategies in circular motion scenarios.

Saketh
Messages
258
Reaction score
2
I'm trying to solve a problem from Richard P. Feynman's Tips on Physics that I was assigned for homework. It's problem **I-5 in the book, if that helps at all.

Here is the problem:
A plank of weight W and length R\sqrt{3} lies in a smooth circular trough of radius R. At one end of the trough is a weight W/2. Calculate the angle that the plank makes with the horizontal.​

I tried to use equilibrium tactics, creating two normal forces and one gravity force at the plank-weight system's center of mass. I then used net force equations and net torque equations to solve for the angle. But this failed. Since it is a circle, the normal forces are not vertical or horizontal.

How am I supposed to do this?

P.S. Is it possible to use Latex to format stuff on these forums?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Saketh said:
I tried to use equilibrium tactics, creating two normal forces and one gravity force at the plank-weight system's center of mass. I then used net force equations and net torque equations to solve for the angle. But this failed. Since it is a circle, the normal forces are not vertical or horizontal.

How am I supposed to do this?
Using torque and force equations should work just fine. While the normal forces are neither vertical nor horizontal, they do have a fixed relationship to each other. (Hint: What is the angle between normal force and plank?)

P.S. Is it possible to use Latex to format stuff on these forums?
Absolutely. Look here: https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=8997
 
I figured that both angles between each normal force and the plane are equal, but that it wouldn't help me. Is there any method to solve this problem besides torques and forces? I seem to be missing something in my work.

Here's my premise:
<br /> \Sigma \tau=F_{N_{2}}sin(\alpha)-(3W/2)sin(\alpha)
\Sigma F_{y} = F_{N_{1}}sin(\alpha-\theta)+F_{N_{2}}sin(\alpha-\theta)-3W/2
\Sigma F_{x} = F_{N_{1}}cos(\alpha-\theta)-F_{N_{2}}sin(\alpha-\theta)

where \theta is the angle that we are looking for, and \alpha is the difference between the plank-normal angle and \theta.

This should work, but I fear the geometry of it.
 
Last edited:
Saketh said:
I figured that both angles between each normal force and the plane are equal, but that it wouldn't help me.
Sure it will help you. Find that angle and use it in your equations--it will simplify things greatly.
Is there any method to solve this problem besides torques and forces?
That's the most straightforward method that I can see.

I seem to be missing something in my work.
You're closer than you think. In addition to the above tip, all you need are these two equations:
(1) Sum of torques about the center of mass = 0.
(2) Sum of horizontal forces = 0

That's all you need. (The geometry seems more difficult than it is because you are trying to solve the problem in general; instead, make use of the specific plank length that you are given.)

\Sigma \tau=F_{N_{2}}sin(\alpha)-(3W/2)sin(\alpha)
I see forces and angles, but no lengths.
 
The lack of lengths in torques was a mistake in typing. It should be \Sigma \tau=F_{N_{2}}sin(\alpha)(R\sqrt{3})-(3W/2)sin(\alpha)(5R\sqrt{3}/6)
 
Where is the center of mass of the system?
 
Of the rod, I thought that the center of mass is at 5R\sqrt{3}/6. But now I am thinking otherwise.

Here is my work for it:
<br /> x_{com}=\frac{(W)(R\sqrt{3}/2)+(W/2)(R\sqrt{3})}{W + W/2}<br />
<br /> x_{com}=\frac{R\sqrt{3}}{3}<br />

This makes no sense to me! How can the center of mass be \frac{R\sqrt{3}}{3} from the left end of the rod, assuming the weight is on the right end?
 
Saketh said:
Of the rod, I thought that the center of mass is at 5R\sqrt{3}/6. But now I am thinking otherwise.
Good. :wink:

Here is my work for it:
<br /> x_{com}=\frac{(W)(R\sqrt{3}/2)+(W/2)(R\sqrt{3})}{W + W/2}<br />
Good.
<br /> x_{com}=\frac{R\sqrt{3}}{3}<br />
Recheck your arithmetic.

This makes no sense to me! How can the center of mass be \frac{R\sqrt{3}}{3} from the left end of the rod, assuming the weight is on the right end?
You're right, it doesn't make sense. (You made an error.)
 
<br /> x_{com}=\frac{2R\sqrt{3}}{3}<br />
A stupid math error. Thanks for pointing it out, or I may have spent hours poring over the physics.

Previous, I had a trigonometric equation equal to \frac{5}{6}, and I wished that it instead equaled \frac{2}{3}, because that would yield the correct answer of 30 degrees. Now that I have pinpointed the error, I get the trigonometric equation equal to \frac{2}{3}, and I can rest easy.

Thanks for the assistance!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
990
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K