- 29,526
- 21,328
Baiatul122001 said:Maybe the textbook's solution is wrong
If that is the textbook solution in post #9, then you and I were right about the interpretation of the problem.
The discussion revolves around a mechanics problem involving two bodies: one thrown vertically and the other horizontally. Participants are tasked with determining the speed of the horizontal body, B, in relation to the vertical body, A, as they fall under gravity.
The discussion is ongoing, with various interpretations of the problem being explored. Some participants have offered algebraic expressions and calculations, while others question the validity of these approaches and seek clarification on the definitions and assumptions being used.
There is a noted complexity in the problem, with participants expressing uncertainty about the setup and the relationships between the variables involved. The discussion includes references to specific equations and the need for dimensional consistency, indicating a focus on the mathematical formulation of the problem.
Baiatul122001 said:Maybe the textbook's solution is wrong
Baiatul122001 said:Maybe the textbook's solution is wrong
And the question should have said the distance is "at its minimum just as..."PeroK said:If that is the textbook solution in post #9, then you and I were right about the interpretation of the problem.
I am obtaining a similar solution. There is constant relative velocity between the two projectiles.archaic said:Is this the textbook's solution? Weird, my solution doesn't depend on ##v_1## at all, rather on ##h,\,g## and ##x_B(t=0s)##.
Please use the reply button so that readers know what post you are responding to.akawter said:A at that time you calculated?