Mechanics question derivations terminal velocity (quadratic case)

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the derivation of the quadratic case of terminal velocity in mechanics, specifically addressing equations related to motion and forces acting on an object. Participants are examining the correctness of certain equations and their derivations as presented in a textbook.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to clarify the derivation process and questions the signs in the equations presented in the textbook. They seek understanding of specific terms and relationships between variables in the context of terminal velocity.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided responses to the original poster's questions, suggesting that there may be an error in the textbook and offering explanations related to the derivation of certain equations. The discussion appears to be ongoing, with participants exploring the implications of the equations and their derivations.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working with specific equations from a textbook, which may contain errors, and are discussing the implications of these potential inaccuracies on the understanding of terminal velocity. There is an emphasis on the relationships between differentials and their interpretations in the context of motion.

Genericcoder
Messages
130
Reaction score
0
hi so basically my question is derivation of derivation of the quadratic case of the terminal velocity


I have attached the pictures in picture 1 I don't know I think the book has error in his derivation @ equation 2.4.13 shouldn't it be + instead of negative ??

& in second picture their is something I don't understand two stuff acctually first is in equation 2.4.15
how did he come up with 1/2 * dv^2 / dy? and my second question is
du/dy = -1/vt^2 * dv^2/dy how did he come up with dv^2/dy ??

thanks a lot.
 

Attachments

  • photo.jpg
    photo.jpg
    33.9 KB · Views: 572
  • photo (1).jpg
    photo (1).jpg
    37.4 KB · Views: 679
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes the sign is wrong.
And dv/dt = dv/dy dy/dt = dv/dy v
since v = dy/dt .
And since dv²/dt = 2 v dv/dt, the last result follows.
 
could u explain this line a little more ->dv²/dt = 2 v dv/dt, the last result follows?
 
read:

dv²/dy = 2 v dv/dy

which implies

v dv/dy = 1/2 dv²/dy
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
806
Replies
13
Views
3K