Mechanics question derivations terminal velocity (quadratic case)

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on the derivation of the quadratic case of terminal velocity, specifically questioning the signs and equations presented in a textbook. A participant points out a potential error in the sign of an equation and seeks clarification on the derivation of certain terms, particularly how 1/2 * dv²/dy is obtained. The conversation also addresses the relationship between velocity and its derivatives, explaining how dv²/dt relates to v and dv/dt. The clarification provided confirms the correct interpretation of the equations and their derivations. Overall, the discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding the mathematical relationships in the context of terminal velocity.
Genericcoder
Messages
130
Reaction score
0
hi so basically my question is derivation of derivation of the quadratic case of the terminal velocity


I have attached the pictures in picture 1 I don't know I think the book has error in his derivation @ equation 2.4.13 shouldn't it be + instead of negative ??

& in second picture their is something I don't understand two stuff acctually first is in equation 2.4.15
how did he come up with 1/2 * dv^2 / dy? and my second question is
du/dy = -1/vt^2 * dv^2/dy how did he come up with dv^2/dy ??

thanks alot.
 

Attachments

  • photo.jpg
    photo.jpg
    33.9 KB · Views: 562
  • photo (1).jpg
    photo (1).jpg
    37.4 KB · Views: 668
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes the sign is wrong.
And dv/dt = dv/dy dy/dt = dv/dy v
since v = dy/dt .
And since dv²/dt = 2 v dv/dt, the last result follows.
 
could u explain this line a little more ->dv²/dt = 2 v dv/dt, the last result follows?
 
read:

dv²/dy = 2 v dv/dy

which implies

v dv/dy = 1/2 dv²/dy
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K