Discussion Overview
The discussion revolves around potential candidates to replace Tim Russert as the host of "Meet the Press." Participants explore various personalities from journalism and media, debating their suitability for the role based on their styles and past performances. The conversation includes opinions on both established journalists and unconventional choices, reflecting on the qualities needed for the position.
Discussion Character
- Debate/contested
- Exploratory
Main Points Raised
- Some participants express strong disapproval of Andrea Mitchell and Chris Matthews as potential hosts, questioning their journalistic integrity.
- Charlie Rose is suggested by multiple participants, though some believe his style may not fit the political landscape of the show.
- David Gregory is mentioned as a likely candidate, with mixed opinions on his ability to fill Russert's shoes.
- Jon Stewart is proposed humorously, with some participants arguing he could do well, while others dismiss the idea outright.
- Several participants nominate Lara Logan and Trish Regan as a dynamic duo, citing their toughness and intelligence.
- There is a suggestion that "Meet the Press" could benefit from a panel of journalists, reminiscent of its earlier format.
- Tom Brokaw is mentioned as a potential temporary host, with some expressing concerns about his clarity and engagement.
- Some participants advocate for a "good cop, bad cop" approach in hosting, reflecting on the current political climate.
- Concerns are raised about the interviewing style of David Gregory, with calls for a more hard-hitting approach.
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
Participants do not reach a consensus on who should replace Russert, with multiple competing views and strong opinions expressed about various candidates. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best choice for the role.
Contextual Notes
Participants reference various styles and past performances of potential candidates, indicating a reliance on subjective impressions rather than objective evaluations. The discussion includes humor and sarcasm, particularly regarding unconventional suggestions.