Mental Math Tricks: Worth It or Parlor Trick?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter ajgrebel
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the value of mental math tricks, questioning whether they contribute to a deeper understanding of mathematics or if they are merely superficial techniques. Participants explore various shortcuts and their practical applications, particularly in exam settings.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that mental math tricks can be useful shortcuts, particularly for squaring two-digit numbers and multiplying larger numbers quickly during exams.
  • Others argue that any trick has a mathematical basis, citing examples like the rule of 3 for divisibility, which they consider to be more than just a trick.
  • One participant expresses concern about whether investing time in learning these tricks is worthwhile beyond their utility as parlor tricks.
  • Another participant shares a method for checking addition using the concept of "casting out nines," illustrating the mathematical principles behind it.
  • There is mention of modular arithmetic and number theory as foundational concepts that support the validity of these mental math techniques.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a mix of views on the usefulness of mental math tricks, with some finding them beneficial while others question their depth and applicability. No consensus is reached on whether these tricks enhance understanding or are merely superficial.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note that the effectiveness of these tricks may depend on the specific mathematical context and the individual's familiarity with the underlying principles. There is also mention of limitations in the resources provided for learning these techniques.

ajgrebel
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Are they actually worth looking into, to develop a quicker and deeper understanding of math or are they just a step above parlor tricks?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I don't know about a deeper understanding, but there are certainly cases where certain shortcuts are useful. Squaring 2 digit numbers or breaking down multiplication of 3+ digit numbers into several operations is very useful when time is a concern, such as during an exam.

I always like to find the shorter way. When you do, it will be pretty obvious which one(s) will be useful by how often you use them and how easy they become. Like stated, squaring 2 digit numbers or multiplication of 2 large numbers is what I encounter the most at school and work, so I certainly think those are useful.

Personally I have no use for squaring 4 or 5 digit numbers.

Were you talking about something else?
 
Any "trick" would have a mathematical underpinning for why it works and therefore I would consider it useful. The rule of 3 is a good example- if a number's digits add up to something divisible by 3 then the number itself is divisible by three e.g. 141 1+4+1=6 so it is divisible by 3. This is no "trick," there is a mathematical reason for it (I don't feel like writing the proof but I'm sure you could find it on wiki). Also, being able to multiply two and three digit numbers quickly in your head comes in handy on tests (when not allowed to use a calculator).
 
Thanks for all the info. I just wanted to make sure that I wasn't wasting my time on something that would not be benificial beyond the mere parlor tricks.
 
That's a good one steff, I will certainly remember that trick. Is there some sort of resource for information like this?
 
QuarkCharmer said:
That's a good one steff, I will certainly remember that trick. Is there some sort of resource for information like this?

If you mean for divisibility, you can refer to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Divisibility_rule
 
Steff196 said:
Any "trick" would have a mathematical underpinning for why it works and therefore I would consider it useful. The rule of 3 is a good example- if a number's digits add up to something divisible by 3 then the number itself is divisible by three e.g. 141 1+4+1=6 so it is divisible by 3. This is no "trick," there is a mathematical reason for it (I don't feel like writing the proof but I'm sure you could find it on wiki). Also, being able to multiply two and three digit numbers quickly in your head comes in handy on tests (when not allowed to use a calculator).

There is a similar rule involving 9s. If a number's digits add up to 9 or a multiple of 9, then the number itself is divisible by 9. In times past, people were taught to check their addition by the technique of "casting out 9s."

Here's an example where I have intentionally made an error.
Code:
 34
 45
 51
+28
---
168
To check I add up the digits of each of the terms to be added. If the digits of any number form a two-digit number, I can add those digits to produce a single digit. If the digits add up to 9, I can throw it away (that's the casting out part).
34 --> 7
45 --> 9 --> 0
51 --> 6
28 --> 10 --> 1

The four numbers at the left boil down to 7 + 0 + 6 + 1 --> 14 --> 5
The digits in the answer I showed, 168, add to 15 --> 6
Since 5 and 6 aren't equal, I know I have made a mistake. This prompts me to check my addition, where I notice that I carried 2 into the 10's column but I should have carried only 1. After adding the numbers again, I see that the sum is 158, the digits of which add to 5.

The mathematics underlying this is part of number theory, and modular arithmetic. Rewriting a number as the sum of its digits is in effect working in modulo 9, in which all numbers fall into one of nine equivalence classes. Each of these classes represents the remainder when the number is divided by 9. It can be proved that the sum of the digits of any integer is in the same equivalence class as the integer itself.
 
Mark44 said:
The mathematics underlying this is part of number theory, and modular arithmetic. Rewriting a number as the sum of its digits is in effect working in modulo 9, in which all numbers fall into one of nine equivalence classes. Each of these classes represents the remainder when the number is divided by 9. It can be proved that the sum of the digits of any integer is in the same equivalence class as the integer itself.

Exactly what I was going to say. Modular arithmetic and number theory give you the ability to use your own tricks whenever you need them (don't try to memorize that wikipedia list). The wikipedia link given doesn't do the theory behind the techniques justice. If you want to learn some similar techniques a good place to start would be to learn the euclidean algorithm and working with modular arithmetic.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
5K