houlahound
- 907
- 223
Can a table of values for W be computed?
ie
z in cloum a, W(z) in colum b.
ie
z in cloum a, W(z) in colum b.
The forum discussion centers around the mathematical expression 6÷2(2+1) and the confusion it generates regarding order of operations. Participants highlight the debate over "implied multiplication" and its lack of formal definition in standard mathematical texts. The conversation also touches on the Lambert W function and its applications in various fields, asserting its relevance alongside traditional functions like sine. Ultimately, the discussion emphasizes the importance of clarity in mathematical notation and the need for educators to address these ambiguities in teaching.
PREREQUISITESMathematics educators, students, and anyone interested in clarifying mathematical notation and understanding the implications of order of operations in problem-solving.
houlahound said:Can a table of values for W be computed?
ie
z in cloum a, W(z) in colum b.
houlahound said:OK this I can do, expansion of W
![]()
This maybe
houlahound said:But this discussion started that W can not be expressed by more elementary functions when from above clearly it can.