Merry-go-round. angular velocity

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a merry-go-round and the calculation of its angular velocity after a child jumps onto it. The initial attempt incorrectly applied conservation of energy instead of conservation of angular momentum. The correct approach involves equating the initial angular momentum of the child to the final angular momentum of the system, leading to the formula m(v)(r) = I(ω) + m(r^2)(ω). The solution reveals that the resulting angular velocity is 0.40 rad/s, highlighting the importance of using the right conservation principle in rotational dynamics. The user expresses gratitude for the clarification on the correct method.
mybrohshi5
Messages
365
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I am studying for my physics test on tuesday and i came across this problem and i thought i got it right after i worked through it but it was wrong.

A playground merry-go-round is at rest, pivoted about a frictionless axle. A child of mass 40 kg runs along a path tangential to the rim with initial speed 3 m/s and jumps onto the merry-go-round. The rotational inertia of the merry-go-round is 500 kg*m2 and the radius of the merry-go-round is 2.5m.

Find the magnitude of the resulting angular velocity of the merry-go-round.

The Attempt at a Solution



Conservation of Energy

K_i = K_f

\frac{1}{2}*m*v^2 = \frac{1}{2}*I*\omega^2_{merry} + \frac{1}{2}*I*\omega^2_{child}

\frac{1}{2}(40kg)(3^2m/s) = \frac{1}{2}(500kg*m^2)(\omega^2) + \frac{1}{2}[ \frac{1}{2}(40kg)(2.5m)^2](\omega^2)

180 kg*m/s = [\frac{1}{2}(500kg*m^2) + (\frac{1}{2})(\frac{1}{2})(40kg)(2.5m)^2] (\omega^2)

\omega = 0.7589 rad/s

This is wrong but i can't figure out why or where i went wrong :(

This is what the solution to the practice test says to do.

(40kg)(3m/s)(2.5m) = [500kg*m2 + (40kg)(2.5m)2] * \omega_f

I can't figure out what formula this is from or why this solution works but it does.

The answer is \omega = 0.40 rad/s

Thank you in advanced for any help :)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You cannot use the conservation of energy in his case, this is kind of a inelastic collision, the child and the merry-go round move together.

Neither you can use conservation of momentum, as the merry go round is attached to the axle. But the conservation of the angular momentum is valid. What is the initial angular momentum of the child with respect to the axle? (Consider the child a point mass. ) What is the angular momentum of the child when he sits on the merry go round? What is the relation between angular momentum, angular velocity and moment of inertia?

ehild
 
I get it now.

So it uses the conservation of angular momentum which is

L_i = L_f

m(v)(rsin\theta) = I(\omega) + m(r^2)(\omega)

(40)(3)(2.5) = (500 + 40(2.5^2))*(\omega)

I forgot this was going to be on the test haha

Thanks for reminding me and for the help :)
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
7K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
869
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K