I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant.
but its not an argument, right?
how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...