shamieh
- 538
- 0
Use the method of cylindrical shells to find the volume of the solid obtained by rotating the region bounded by the given curves about the x axis...$$y = x^3$$ , $$y = 8$$ and $$x = 0$$
So my question is: Why did they cube root the y (to be more technical why did they put it in terms of x? I don't understand what this is accomplishing? Can't you just set up your graph and have a horizontal asymptote at y = 8, a parabola that doesn't pass (2,8), and then just set up your integral and solve as $$2\pi \int^8_1 x(x^2)$$ dx ?
- - - Updated - - -
Nevermind i see what is going on... 2pi * X
so that's why you set x =
So my question is: Why did they cube root the y (to be more technical why did they put it in terms of x? I don't understand what this is accomplishing? Can't you just set up your graph and have a horizontal asymptote at y = 8, a parabola that doesn't pass (2,8), and then just set up your integral and solve as $$2\pi \int^8_1 x(x^2)$$ dx ?
- - - Updated - - -
shamieh said:Use the method of cylindrical shells to find the volume of the solid obtained by rotating the region bounded by the given curves about the x axis...$$y = x^3$$ , $$y = 8$$ and $$x = 0$$
So my question is: Why did they cube root the y (to be more technical why did they put it in terms of x? I don't understand what this is accomplishing? Can't you just set up your graph and have a horizontal asymptote at y = 8, a parabola that doesn't pass (2,8), and then just set up your integral and solve as $$2\pi \int^8_1 x(x^2)$$ dx ?
Nevermind i see what is going on... 2pi * X
so that's why you set x =