Methods of elementary Number Theory

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving the Diophantine equation $x^2 + y^2 = z^2$ using elementary number theory methods. It confirms that expressing solutions in a parameterized form is essential for classification and enumeration. The non-trivial solutions can be represented by the formulas $x = \pm d(u^2 - v^2)$, $y = \pm 2duv$, $z = \pm d(u^2 + v^2)$, and $x = \pm d2uv$, $y = \pm d(u^2 - v^2)$, $z = \pm d(u^2 + v^2)$. The conversation emphasizes that multiple parameterizations exist for the equation, and proving one of them qualifies as solving the equation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Diophantine equations
  • Familiarity with parameterization techniques in number theory
  • Knowledge of integer mappings and functions
  • Basic concepts of the zero locus in algebraic geometry
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the parameterization of Diophantine equations in detail
  • Explore the theory of quadratic forms and their applications
  • Learn about the classification of integer solutions in algebraic equations
  • Investigate the historical context and applications of the Pythagorean theorem
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of number theory, and anyone interested in solving Diophantine equations and understanding their parameterizations.

evinda
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,741
Reaction score
0
Hi! (Cool)

I am given the following exercise:Try to solve the diophantine equation $x^2+y^2=z^2$ , using methods of elementary Number Theory.

So, do I have to write the proof of the theorem:

The non-trivial solutions of $x^2+y^2=z^2$ are given by the formulas:

$$x=\pm d(u^2-v^2), y=\pm 2duv, z=\pm d(u^2+v^2)$$

or

$$x=\pm d2uv, y=\pm d(u^2-v^2), z=\pm d(u^2+v^2)$$

? (Thinking)
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Yes. That's what solving an equation means, express its solutions in a simpler form, preferably one where all the solutions can be classified and easily enumerated.
 
Given a diophantine equation $P(X_1, X_2, \cdots, X_n) = 0$ over $\Bbb Q$, "solving" it means "enumerate the solutions". Now if the zero locus (the solution set) is (countably) infinite then enumeration is essentially done by parameterization, i.e., producing a set $\{(T_1, T_2, \cdots, T_k) \in \Bbb Z^k : X_i = F_i(T_1, T_2, \cdots, T_k) \, \forall i < n\}$ for some function $F_i$ which maps integers to integers when restricted to $\Bbb Z$.

So yes, proving the parameterization you mentioned would also qualify as "solving". But it is absolutely not nessesary that this is a unique parameterization -- there are a lot of ways to completely parameterize $X^2 + Y^2 + Z^2 = 0$.
 
Bacterius said:
Yes. That's what solving an equation means, express its solutions in a simpler form, preferably one where all the solutions can be classified and easily enumerated.

mathbalarka said:
Given a diophantine equation $P(X_1, X_2, \cdots, X_n) = 0$ over $\Bbb Q$, "solving" it means "enumerate the solutions". Now if the zero locus (the solution set) is (countably) infinite then enumeration is essentially done by parameterization, i.e., producing a set $\{(T_1, T_2, \cdots, T_k) \in \Bbb Z^k : X_i = F_i(T_1, T_2, \cdots, T_k) \, \forall i < n\}$ for some function $F_i$ which maps integers to integers when restricted to $\Bbb Z$.

So yes, proving the parameterization you mentioned would also qualify as "solving". But it is absolutely not nessesary that this is a unique parameterization -- there are a lot of ways to completely parameterize $X^2 + Y^2 + Z^2 = 0$.

Nice, thanks a lot! (Smile)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
891
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K