Graduate Metric on ℝ^2 Invariant under Matrix Transformations

  • Thread starter Thread starter FrederikPhysics
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Invariant Metric
Click For Summary
A nontrivial metric on ℝ^2 invariant under specific 2x2 matrix transformations can be derived using matrix algebra. The discussion highlights that every nonsingular matrix can be diagonalized, leading to a form of the metric that preserves certain transformations. The transformation matrix, denoted as \tilde{T}, is defined to maintain the metric's properties, with conditions on the parameters to ensure real values. If the derived transformation preserves the modified metric, it can be adapted back to the original metric through a specific relationship. The existence of such metrics and transformations opens up further exploration of their properties and implications in mathematical physics.
FrederikPhysics
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Hello, I am looking for some nontrivial metric on ℝ^2 invariant under the coordinate transformations defined by the 2x2 matrix
[1 a12(θ)]
[a21(θ) 1],
where aik is some real function of θ. In the same way that the Minkowski metric on ℝ^2 is invariant under Lorentz transformations.
Does this metric exist? If not does it exist for some related type of transformations? And why? Are there some other nice features about this kind of transformations/matrices?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
FrederikPhysics said:
Hello, I am looking for some nontrivial metric on ℝ^2 invariant under the coordinate transformations defined by the 2x2 matrix
[1 a12(θ)]
[a21(θ) 1],
where aik is some real function of θ. In the same way that the Minkowski metric on ℝ^2 is invariant under Lorentz transformations.
Does this metric exist? If not does it exist for some related type of transformations? And why? Are there some other nice features about this kind of transformations/matrices?

Okay, this is something that can be completely solved using matrix algebra.

First of all, every nonsingular matrix can be diagonalized. So if we assume it's nonsingular, then there is a matrix U such that U g U^T = \tilde{g}, where \tilde{g} has the form:

\tilde{g} = \left( \begin{array} \\ g_1 & 0 \\ 0 & g_2 \end{array} \right)

and where U^T U = 1 (U^T means the transpose of U).

So let's look for transformations \tilde{T} that preserve \tilde{g}. That means that for any column matrices u and v,

(\tilde{T} v)^T \tilde{g} (\tilde{T} u) = v^T \tilde{g} u

which means that \tilde{T}^T \tilde{g} \tilde{T} = \tilde{g}

You can find the form of \tilde{T} by using matrix algebra, but I'll skip to the answer:

\tilde{T} = \left( \begin{array} \\ cos(\theta) & \sqrt{\frac{g_2}{g_1}} sin(\theta) \\ \sqrt{\frac{g_1}{g_2}} sin(\theta) & cos(\theta) \end{array} \right)

(This matrix has to be real, which means that if \frac{g_2}{g_1} < 0, then you have to choose \theta to be imaginary, which means using sinh and cosh instead of sin and cos).

Now, to get back to the original problem, if \tilde{T} preserves \tilde{g}, then T \equiv U^T \tilde{T} U is a transform preserving the original g.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
8K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K