Metricity Equation: ∇_{μ}g_{αβ}=0, ∇_{μ}g^αβ ≠ 0?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter kuecken
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the metricity equation in differential geometry, specifically examining the relationship between the covariant derivatives of the metric tensor components, both covariant and contravariant. Participants explore whether the condition ∇_{μ}g^{αβ}=0 can be derived from ∇_{μ}g_{αβ}=0, and the implications of these relationships in the context of tensor calculus.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant states that ∇_{μ}g_{αβ}=0 is the metricity equation and questions whether ∇_{μ}g^{αβ}=0 also holds, expressing uncertainty about their relationship.
  • Another participant asserts that ∇_{μ}g_{αβ}=0 is equivalent to ∇_{μ}g^{αβ}=0, providing a reasoning based on the properties of the metric tensor and covariant derivatives.
  • A participant seeks clarification on the arbitrary nature of the metric tensor in the context of their derivation, questioning the validity of their last step in the argument.
  • Another participant suggests contracting both sides of an equation involving the metric tensor to demonstrate that ∇_{μ}g^{αν}=0 follows from the metricity condition.
  • One participant introduces the concept of contravariant derivatives and discusses the implications of the metricity condition on the manipulation of the metric tensor during differentiation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

There is disagreement regarding the equivalence of the two conditions involving the covariant derivatives of the metric tensor. While one participant asserts the equivalence, another expresses uncertainty and seeks clarification, indicating that the discussion remains unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Participants have not fully resolved the assumptions underlying the equivalence of the covariant derivatives of the metric tensor, and there are unresolved mathematical steps in the derivations presented.

kuecken
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
∇_{\mu}g_{\alpha\beta}=0 is the metricity equation (∇ the covariant derivative).
However, I wondered whether also ∇_{\mu}g^{\alpha\beta}=0 holds?
When I checked it, it did not. But I really want it to hold, so I was wondering whether I made a mistake.
Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi kuecken. In fact ##\nabla_{\mu}g_{\alpha\beta} = 0 \Leftrightarrow \nabla_{\mu}g^{\alpha\beta} = 0##.

This is actually very easy to see:

##0 = \nabla_{\mu}\delta^{\alpha}{}{}_{\beta} = \nabla_{\mu}(g^{\alpha \gamma}g_{\gamma \beta}) = g^{\alpha\gamma}\nabla_{\mu}g_{\gamma \beta} + g_{\gamma\beta}\nabla_{\mu}g^{\alpha \gamma}## holds identically hence if ##\nabla_{\mu}g_{\alpha\beta} = 0## then ##\nabla_{\mu}g^{\alpha\beta} = 0## and similarly for the converse.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
This is the expression I arrived at. However, can I argue that the g_{\gamma\beta} in front of ∇ is arbitrary? Or how do I do that last step
 
So we have ##g_{\gamma\beta}\nabla_{\mu}g^{\alpha\gamma} = 0##. Contract both sides with ##g^{\nu\beta}## to get ##\delta^{\nu}{}{}_{\gamma}\nabla_{\mu}g^{\alpha\gamma} = \nabla_{\mu}g^{\alpha\nu} = 0##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Because of the metricity condition, one can define the so-called contravariant derivatives:

\nabla^{\mu}T_{\alpha} = g^{\mu\nu} \nabla_{\nu}T_{\alpha}

= \nabla_{\nu}\left(g^{\mu\nu}T_{\alpha}\right)

that is freely take out and put back the metric tensor under the covariant/contravariant differentiation sign.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 71 ·
3
Replies
71
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K