Other Metrics on fields in physics with funding/activity?

Click For Summary
Current discussions highlight the importance of understanding funding and activity metrics in physics, particularly in Europe. There is a specific interest in Quantum Information and Quantum Computing as potential fields for specialization. Key considerations include not just the total funding available, but also funding per researcher, which can vary significantly based on location and associated costs. The growth trajectory of these fields is also a crucial factor, as trends can shift over time, making it essential to anticipate future interests of funding agencies. Ultimately, personal interest and commitment to a field are emphasized as critical for success, suggesting that aspiring physicists should focus on becoming leading experts in areas they are passionate about, rather than solely chasing funding trends.
YellowBiro
Messages
8
Reaction score
1
Are there any metrics that show which areas in physics have lots of funding and activity at this present moment? Of course it would vary by location as well. I'm mainly interested in Europe.

I am basically trying to figure out if Quantum Information/Quantum Computing is a good field to specialise in. Also want to see if there are other theoretical physics fields which are also "trending".
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The absolute amount of money is not the right question. More total money in a field simply means more researchers but not better career chances.
Funding per researcher? Variations will mainly come from other costs (experiments, travel, ...) or the regional distribution: Incomes are higher in San Francisco than in the middle of nowhere, Montana - but living costs are higher as well.
Growth over time? This is getting more interesting, but also often hard to predict. You want future growth - but that means anticipating what will be interesting in the future before funding agencies do so. What is trending now doesn't have to be trending in a few years when it might be relevant for you. Do you expect to make better decisions than funding agencies?
YellowBiro said:
I am basically trying to figure out if Quantum Information/Quantum Computing is a good field to specialise in.
If and only if you are interested in it.
The main thing you can influence is your performance in the field. The best career chances in a field are useless if you can't be bothered contributing a lot to it. Better become the leading expert in whatever you are interested in.
 
  • Like
Likes Vanadium 50
TL;DR: Jackson or Zangwill for Electrodynamics? Hi, I want to learn ultrafast optics and I am interested in condensed matter physics, ie using ultrafast optics in condensed matter systems. However, before I get onto ultrafast optics I need to improve my electrodynamics knowledge. Should I study Jackson or Zangwill for Electrodynamics? My level at the moment is Griffiths. Given my interest in ultrafast optics in condensed matter, I am not sure which book is better suited for me. If...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
723
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
698
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
852
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K