Mgh & -gmM/R increase with distance from Earth

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter ofeyrpf
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Earth increase
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around gravitational potential energy and its behavior as one moves away from the Earth. Participants explore the implications of defining gravitational potential at different reference points and the relationship between gravitational potential and distance from the Earth.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes that gravitational potential is defined as mgh near the Earth's surface, where g is considered constant, and questions the implications of this definition as one moves away from the Earth.
  • Another participant confirms that potential differences are significant, allowing for arbitrary constants to be added to set a zero point for potential.
  • A participant calculates that gravitational potential is 0 at infinity and approximately -62.53 mega-joules per kilogram at the Earth's surface, suggesting that potential increases with distance from the surface.
  • One participant expresses confusion about how potential increases with distance from the Earth, questioning the influence of the Earth on potential energy as one moves away.
  • Another participant explains that gravitational potential energy decreases as kinetic energy increases in free fall, maintaining a constant sum, and clarifies that gravitational potential is defined per unit mass.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the concept that gravitational potential increases with distance from the Earth's surface, but there is some confusion and questioning about the implications of this behavior and the influence of the Earth on potential energy.

Contextual Notes

Participants discuss the definitions and reference points for gravitational potential, indicating that the choice of zero potential can vary, which may lead to different interpretations of potential energy at various distances.

ofeyrpf
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I know potential = mgh where g can be considered constant close to the surface of the Earth. So as we move away from the Earth the h and P increase.
And taking P = 0 @ infinity then P = -GMm/r so P < 0 always and increases to 0 as you move away from the Earth.
So it seems there is no potential at infinity and even less as you get closer to the Earth! Is that correct?
What if for P = -Gmm/r, I put P = 0 at the surface of the Earth as it is for mgh?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes. Of course, only potential differences are physically significant so you can add any arbitrary constant to your potential and thereby set your zero somewhere else.
 
ofeyrpf said:
So it seems there is no potential at infinity and even less as you get closer to the Earth!
Better stated as potential = 0 at ∞, and about -62.53 mega-joules / kilogram at the surface of the earth. In either case, potential increases with distance from the Earth's surface. You could define P = 62.53 mega-joules / kilogram - GMm/r to get a potential of 0 at the Earth's surface and 62.53 mega-joules / kilogram at ∞, which would correspond to mgh at relatively low altitudes.

The constants that would correlate with ~ 62.53 mega-joules / kilogram and g = 9.80655 m / s2 (standard value):

G = -6.674 x 10-11 N (m/kg)2
mass of Earth = 5.974 x 1024 kg
radius of Earth = 6376 x 103 m
 
Last edited:
Hi,

Thanks for the reply. I understand now and see how P can be set to 0 anywhere but always "potential increases with distance from the Earth's surface."

It seems strange that although potential is caused because an object is in the Earth's gravitational field, it increases as you move away from the Earth, where i would think the Earth had less influence.
 
ofeyrpf said:
It seems strange that although potential is caused because an object is in the Earth's gravitational field, it increases as you move away from the Earth, where i would think the Earth had less influence.
That's because potential energy is defined as the negative of the work done by the force generating the field. If you consider the sum of the kinetic energy of an object in free fall (with no drag or other forces involved) in the gravitation field plus it's gravitational potential energy, the sum will be a constant as gravitational potential energy decreases and kinetic energy increases.

Gravitational potential is defined as the gravitational potential energy per unit mass, so it follows the same convention of increasing with distance from the source of the gravitational field.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
15K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
6K
Replies
42
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K