What Is the Work Done on a Body Taken from Earth's Surface to Infinity?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the work done on a body of mass m as it is moved from the surface of the Earth to infinity, exploring concepts in gravitational potential energy and kinetic energy. The problem involves various scenarios, including calculating work done at different distances and analyzing energy changes during motion under gravitational influence.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the calculation of work done (W1 and W2) using integrals and question the relationships between potential energy and kinetic energy. There are attempts to clarify the signs and values of potential energy at different distances, as well as the implications of these calculations on the work-energy principle.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, providing various attempts at solutions and clarifications. Some have reached conclusions about the relationships between work and potential energy, while others are still questioning specific calculations and concepts, indicating a productive exploration of the topic.

Contextual Notes

There are ongoing discussions about the assumptions made regarding potential energy being negative at distances closer than infinity and the implications of these assumptions on the calculations. Participants also note the need to clarify the definitions and relationships between kinetic and potential energy in the context of the problem.

  • #31
My brain is dead, I don't know... :H:confused:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Lets remember what we studied about projectile motion. If the only force is gravity then the horizontal velocity vector is always constant.
and what do we know about the vertical velocity at maximum height?

So you started with ... velocity and ended up with ... velocity (Fill the dots)

So is this loss in kinetic energy is equal to the gain in potential energy? If yes then they will reach it if not then rip astronauts
 
  • #33
Vertical velocity at maximum height is 0.
 
  • #34
Taniaz said:
Vertical velocity at maximum height is 0.
and the horizontal? as we know it doesn't change? So if we can figure out what it is at the beginning it is the same at the end. So what is the horizontal component?
 
  • #35
vx=vo cos(theta)?
 
  • #36
Taniaz said:
vx=vo cos(theta)?
Yes now try to form an equation to get the maximum height this ship can get to using energy conservation
 
  • #37
That's what I'm not sure of. I know the maximum height h = vo^2 sin ^ 2 (theta) / 2g is what we have for constant gravity
I know what vo is in terms of h but what happens to the sin^2(theta)/2g

h will only depend on vx so we know that vx=vo cos(theta) so vo=vx/cos(theta)

Plug it into h= vo^2 sin ^ 2 (theta) / 2g = ( vx /cos(theta))^2 sin^2(theta)
Not sure what happens with the 2g, do I just disregard it.
So h = vx sin^2 (theta) / cos^2 (theta) = vx tan^2 (theta)
Am I anywhere close? I don't know.
 
  • #38
Taniaz said:
That's what I'm not sure of. I know the maximum height h = vo^2 sin ^ 2 (theta) / 2g is what we have for constant gravity
I know what vo is in terms of h but what happens to the sin^2(theta)/2g?
Not sure what you mean.. Clarify a bit more.

Anyway, You can't use this equation because it assumes that gravity is constant (Which we may approximate if we are not really far from a point). As Haruspex, we use energy conservation principle to have more accurate results.

So what you have to do is just ask yourself. If I am starting at the surface of the planet what kind of energy do I have? Assuming I am not going vertically, What kind of energy do I have at the maximum height?

So as you pointed out, we have velocity ##V_o## at the beginning and what is the potential energy?. Now at maximum height, you figured we only have horizontal velocity and what is the potential energy at that point?

From conservation of energy principle, we know that at any point the energy must be constant. Why not equate the two and form an equation?
 
  • #39
You could just find the change in kinetic energy if it was going vertically and the change in kinetic energy if it wasn't and say that they don't equal each other or situation #1 > situation 2# which means it will not reach it. But it is a good practice to form equations. Physics is gained by practising.
 
  • #40
Biker said:
Lets remember what we studied about projectile motion. If the only force is gravity then the horizontal velocity vector is always constant.
Be careful. The horizontal velocity vector is not going to be constant when "horizontal" is changing. If we are considering a realistic scenario in which gravity drops off as a function of vertical position then we need to also consider that the surface of the Earth is a sphere and not a plane. "Horizontal" and "vertical" change as a function of horizontal position.

While the horizontal component of velocity does change over time, there is a different conserved quantity that does not. Can you name it?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: QuantumQuest
  • #41
jbriggs444 said:
Be careful. The horizontal velocity vector is not going to be constant when "horizontal" is changing. If we are considering a realistic scenario in which gravity drops off as a function of vertical position then we need to also consider that the surface of the Earth is a sphere and not a plane. "Horizontal" and "vertical" change as a function of horizontal position.

While the horizontal component of velocity does change over time, there is a different conserved quantity that does not. Can you name it?
Sorry for the last response, I blame high school physics. #Earthisflat (It is a good approximation if we are dealing with not very long horizontal distances but as they are astronauts and leaving the planet then yep as you said)

Not sure what you are suggesting at. I have thought of some ways but didn't reach any answer. Might want an insight on this :c

P.s Apologizing for the OP
 
  • #42
Biker said:
Not sure what you are suggesting at
Angular momentum
 
  • #43
jbriggs444 said:
Angular momentum
Yep still haven't taken that. Thanks.

For the OP, You could use that to finish your answer. (If you couldn't figured it out.)
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K