Micron sized object observed in quantum state

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around a recent claim regarding a 40-micron sized resonator being set into a superposition of states, exploring implications for the quantum-classical boundary. Participants express varying opinions on the significance of this experiment, its implications for quantum mechanics, and the interpretations of quantum theory.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants find the experiment fascinating and a potential new way to explore the quantum-classical border.
  • Others argue that the concept of a "quantum-classical border" does not exist, suggesting that all systems can be in superposition regardless of their size.
  • A participant mentions that the experiment is not surprising due to prior work in the field and the understanding of the physics involved.
  • There is a discussion about the implications of quantum decoherence and the validity of collapse interpretations of quantum mechanics, with some asserting that collapse interpretations are no longer seriously defended.
  • Some participants express skepticism about the significance of the experiment, questioning whether it truly advances understanding of quantum mechanics.
  • One participant proposes that the real interest lies in the comparison between linear and nonlinear quantum mechanics, specifically regarding the duration of superposition versus decoherence.
  • Another participant suggests that the experiment would be more interesting if it demonstrated interference effects similar to the double-slit experiment.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus; there are multiple competing views regarding the significance of the experiment, the existence of a quantum-classical border, and the interpretations of quantum mechanics. Some express agreement on the experimental results, while others challenge the implications drawn from them.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved questions regarding the definitions of terms like "quantum-classical border" and the interpretations of quantum mechanics, particularly in relation to decoherence and collapse. The discussion reflects a variety of perspectives on these complex topics.

  • #31
yoda jedi said:
right, quantum mechanics is demonstrated, like say you; unsurprising, foreseeable, expected.
but what is really at stake, is, the standard quantum mechanics vs nonlinear quantum mechanics, not the superposition itself (per se), but the time of the superposition vs the time of decoherence, if last more or less; if last less, nonlinear model are the correct, if last more, linear models are.
from various sources there is growing evidence for nonlinear models (specific tests must be developed for them, to see which one is the correct).

Dmitry67 said:
it as a test of objective collapse theories?

for nonlinear quantum mechanics.
the next experiments.

The Vienna Experiment, Nature 460 724, Nature Physics 5 485. 2009.
The CalTech Experiment, http://www.kschwabresearch.com/articles/detail/8 , http://media.caltech.edu/press_releases/13271
The LIGO Science Collaboration Experiment, New J. Phys. 11 073032 2009.

...
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
688
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
5K
  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
13K