Micron sized object observed in quantum state

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on a recent claim regarding a 40-micron sized resonator designed by researchers, which they assert can be placed into a superposition of states. Participants express varying opinions on the implications of this experiment for understanding the quantum-classical border, with some asserting that the concept of a border does not exist due to the principles of quantum decoherence. The conversation highlights the ongoing debate about interpretations of quantum mechanics, particularly the relevance of collapse theories versus non-collapse interpretations, and the significance of this experiment in the broader context of quantum mechanics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles, particularly superposition and decoherence.
  • Familiarity with the concept of resonators in quantum experiments.
  • Knowledge of interpretations of quantum mechanics, including collapse and non-collapse theories.
  • Awareness of the historical context of quantum experiments since 2004.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of quantum decoherence on the measurement problem in quantum mechanics.
  • Explore the differences between collapse interpretations and non-collapse interpretations of quantum mechanics.
  • Investigate the role of MEMS resonators in quantum experiments and their applications.
  • Study the historical development of quantum mechanics experiments since 2004, focusing on superposition and entanglement.
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, quantum mechanics researchers, and students interested in the experimental aspects of quantum theory and its interpretations.

  • #31
yoda jedi said:
right, quantum mechanics is demonstrated, like say you; unsurprising, foreseeable, expected.
but what is really at stake, is, the standard quantum mechanics vs nonlinear quantum mechanics, not the superposition itself (per se), but the time of the superposition vs the time of decoherence, if last more or less; if last less, nonlinear model are the correct, if last more, linear models are.
from various sources there is growing evidence for nonlinear models (specific tests must be developed for them, to see which one is the correct).

Dmitry67 said:
it as a test of objective collapse theories?

for nonlinear quantum mechanics.
the next experiments.

The Vienna Experiment, Nature 460 724, Nature Physics 5 485. 2009.
The CalTech Experiment, http://www.kschwabresearch.com/articles/detail/8 , http://media.caltech.edu/press_releases/13271
The LIGO Science Collaboration Experiment, New J. Phys. 11 073032 2009.

...
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
5K
  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
12K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K