Millennium Tower, San Francisco, leaning more than predicted

  • Thread starter Thread starter Astronuc
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Tower
AI Thread Summary
Millennium Tower is experiencing alarming structural issues, sinking at a rate faster than engineers anticipated. Recent reports indicate it settled one inch in just three months, while predictions had estimated this would take a year. The building is now leaning 22 inches from vertical at its top, raising concerns about its stability. Experts warn that if the tower were to topple, it could endanger adjacent buildings, particularly in the event of a significant earthquake, which could trigger liquefaction in the soil. A review of the tower's construction revealed that while the design was independently assessed, no geotechnical review of the underlying soil was conducted, a critical oversight that could have informed the risks associated with the site.
Astronuc
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
22,343
Reaction score
7,141
I just happened to stumble across this new video.

Millennium Tower is Sinking Faster Than Rate ‘Limit' Set by Fix Engineers - Yoiks!​



Interview with Rune Storesund, UC Berkeley Center for Catastrophic Risk Management

It apparently settled (1 inch) in three months what was predicted in one year. And earlier predictions had settling the core region, not to one side. According to a report, it's leaning 22 inches (from vertical), ostensibly at the top of the building!
 
  • Wow
Likes Ivan Seeking and berkeman
Physics news on Phys.org
Astronuc said:
I just happened to stumble across this new video.

Millennium Tower is Sinking Faster Than Rate ‘Limit' Set by Fix Engineers - Yoiks!​



Interview with Rune Storesund, UC Berkeley Center for Catastrophic Risk Management

It apparently settled (1 inch) in three months what was predicted in one year. And earlier predictions had settling the core region, not to one side. According to a report, it's leaning 22 inches (from vertical), ostensibly at the top of the building!

They had better sling some big ropes around it and the adjacent buildings so it doesn't fall over. :olduhh:
 
Ivan Seeking said:
They had better sling some big ropes around it and the adjacent buildings so it doesn't fall over.
If it topples, it'll take other buildings with it. Just image a M6 earthquake or stronger. If they get liquefaction in an earthquake - I wouldn't want to be nearby.
 
  • Wow
Likes Ivan Seeking
Astronuc said:
If it topples, it'll take other buildings with it. Just image a M6 earthquake or stronger. If they get liquefaction in an earthquake - I wouldn't want to be nearby.
Indeed! That could be catastrophic.
 
Ivan Seeking said:
Indeed! That could be catastrophic.
Rune Storesund, UC Berkeley Center for Catastrophic Risk Management, so much said so. It seemed an understatement.

Back in 2017
https://sf.curbed.com/2017/2/3/14500782/millennium-tower-peer-revie
The developers behind the sinking Millennium Tower paid for an independent review of the tower itself before it was built, but not of the site it sits on, according to new testimony at City Hall on Thursday.

The Government Audit and Oversight Committee quizzed Jack Moehle, a professor of structural engineering at UC Berkeley, whom Millennium Partners and its engineer consultants hired to conduct an independent peer review of the building design while it was being entitled.

“The interest was to do an internal review to ensure that the structural system selected was suitable,” Moehle told city lawmakers at Thursday’s hearing. “[So] that if there was a formal peer review for the city later that most questions would be dealt with already.”

Moehle says he inspected the high-rise’s design from top to bottom—but no lower than the bottom. A geotechnical review—i.e., an assessment of the condition of the soil under the building site—wasn’t part of the process, because no one ever hired a geotechnical engineer.
This last part is fundamental to such projects. I don't know if they did or did not hire a geotechnical engineer. That requires different expertise than a structural engineer who looks at the building structure within the building envelop.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Informative
  • Wow
Likes Rive, russ_watters and Ivan Seeking
Every day we learn new things. Sometimes it's just a small fact or realization. No matter how trivial or random, let's start recording our daily lessons. Please start off with "Today I learned". Keep commentary to a minimum and just LIKE posts. I'll start! Today I learned that you clean up a white hat by spraying some cleaner with bleach on it (rinse before putting it back on your head!)
Back
Top