Minimum angular separation for viewing stars

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The minimum angular separation for resolving two stars, considering diffraction effects, is determined using the Rayleigh criterion, expressed as θ=(1.22*λ)/D. In this discussion, participants attempted to calculate this value using λ=550 nm and D=5.0 mm, but encountered discrepancies with the expected results. The best resolution of the human eye is noted as 5e-4 radians, though its derivation remains unclear. The conversation highlights the need for precise values and understanding of diffraction patterns to arrive at the correct answer.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Rayleigh criterion for diffraction
  • Familiarity with light wavelength measurements (e.g., λ=550 nm)
  • Knowledge of aperture diameter in optics (e.g., D=5.0 mm)
  • Basic concepts of circular aperture diffraction patterns
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the derivation of the best resolution of the human eye
  • Explore advanced diffraction patterns in circular apertures
  • Learn about the impact of varying λ and D on angular resolution
  • Investigate practical applications of the Rayleigh criterion in astronomy
USEFUL FOR

Astronomy students, optical engineers, and anyone studying diffraction effects in imaging systems will benefit from this discussion.

grouper
Messages
52
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



What is the minimum angular separation an eye could resolve when viewing two stars, considering only diffraction effects?

Homework Equations



Rayleigh criterion: θ=(1.22*λ)/D

The Attempt at a Solution



This problem doesn't give very much to go on so I think there's a trick I'm missing. I tried estimating using λ=550 nm and D≈5.0 mm (which I got from the problem just before it), but this was incorrect. Our book also states that the best resolution of the human eye is 5e-4 rad, although I'm not sure how they came by this number and it is not the correct answer. I'm not really sure where to go with this one though, especially given so little information.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
what did you get in your estimate?
I got 1.34 x 10^-4 radians
 
That is what I got as well but that is not the correct answer. Perhaps I should have included the following equations as well (derived from Rayleigh):

circular aperture diffraction:

dark rings: sinθ=1.22*(λ/D) or 2.23*(λ/D) or 3.24*(λ/D), etc.

bright rings: sinθ=1.63*(λ/D) or 2.68*(λ/D) or 3.70*(λ/D), etc.

Still doesn't help much though because it yields the same estimates. This problem must not be looking for estimates. I think it has something to do with treating the stars like diffraction points but I'm not really sure if that's correct or how to do that.
 
I can't see anything wrong with the way we have worked it out... it is a standard textbook exercise.
What has been given as the 'correct answer'?
 
It's an online thing so it tells me when I get it wrong but I can't see the right answer unless I want to give up and lose that point. I'll think about it some more.
 
could you get the correct answer by using different (but reasonable) values for λ and D?
 
No, I tried that. I don't think estimation is what this problem is getting at. There's got to be some way to tease some of the variables out; perhaps by assuming the distance to be infinity, even though that's not correct. I'll keep playing around with it; it's due this weekend.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
8K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K