Can the Hubble telescope measure the diameter of Betelgeuse?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the ability of the Hubble telescope to measure the diameter of the star Betelgeuse, which is located 427 light-years from Earth and has a diameter significantly larger than that of the Sun. The problem involves concepts of angular resolution and the Rayleigh Criterion.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between angular resolution and the ability to measure the diameter of a single object, questioning what it means for an object to be distinguishable based on its angular size.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively clarifying their understanding of angular resolution and its implications for observing Betelgeuse. Some have provided insights into how the telescope's resolution affects the visibility of the star's diameter, but no consensus has been reached on the feasibility of the measurement.

Contextual Notes

There is an ongoing exploration of the theoretical aspects of angular resolution and its practical implications for observing celestial objects, with some assumptions about the visibility of Betelgeuse based on its angular size in relation to the telescope's capabilities.

Decimal
Messages
73
Reaction score
7

Homework Statement



The star Betelgeuse is 427 lightyears from earth. Betelgeuse has a diameter 800 times that of the sun, where the diameter of the sun equals ##1.39*10^6 km##. Given that Betelgeuse has an angular resolution given by the Rayleigh Criterion of 58 nRad, is it possible for the Hubble telescope to measure the diameter of Betelgeuse?

Homework Equations



Equation for angular resolution $$ \Delta\theta = \frac {1.22 \lambda} {D}$$

The Attempt at a Solution



I think I am supposed to check whether the angular diameter of Betelgeuse is not less than the angular resolution of the telescope. However I don't really understand the theory behind this. I thought angular resolution had to do with the ability of the telescope to distinguish two objects with a certain angular separation. In this case there is only one object, so what am I trying to distinguish? What would I see through the telescope if the angular diameter is too small?

Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Decimal said:
I thought angular resolution had to do with the ability of the telescope to distinguish two objects with a certain angular separation. In this case there is only one object, so what am I trying to distinguish?
You want to measure the diameter, hence distinguish between the left side and the right side of the star.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Decimal
Okay, I understand. So if you were to look at a star that's too small for the angular resolution of the telescope, would it just be blurry and out of focus? Because you can't distinguish the two sides?
 
Decimal said:
would it just be blurry and out of focus
It would be in focus, but indistinguishable from the image from a point source.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Decimal
BvU said:
It would be in focus, but indistinguishable from the image from a point source.

Ah of course, I see now. Thanks a lot!
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
6K