Minimum distance & electrostatic potential energy

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the interaction between an alpha particle and a zinc nucleus, focusing on calculating the minimum distance between them as the alpha particle approaches the nucleus. The problem involves concepts from electrostatics and energy conservation, specifically relating kinetic energy to electrostatic potential energy.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the charges of the alpha particle and zinc nucleus, questioning how to derive the necessary equations for distance based on given energies. They discuss the relationship between kinetic energy and potential energy as the alpha particle approaches the nucleus.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, attempting to derive equations and clarify concepts. Some have proposed rearranging equations to find the distance, while others are checking assumptions about energy states and the nature of the charges involved. There is a recognition of the need to express the final answer in terms of the radius of the zinc nucleus.

Contextual Notes

There are discussions about the assumptions made regarding the initial position of the alpha particle and the implications of the energy calculations. Participants also note potential confusion regarding the dimensions of the zinc nucleus and the implications of the calculations on its physical properties.

victoriafello
Messages
34
Reaction score
0
An alpha particle (made of 2 protons and 2 neutrons) with initial kinetic energy of 1.20 × 10^-12 J travels directly towards the nucleus of the stationary zinc atom The nucleus of a zinc atom contains 30 protons and 35 neutrons, and has a diameter of 4.00 × 10^-13 cm.

The alpha particle slows as kinetic energy is converted to electrostatic potential energy. Calculate the minimum distance between the centre of the zinc nucleus and the alpha particle. For simplicity, assume the charge of the nucleus to be concentrated at its centre. Express your answer in terms of the radius of the zinc nucleus

i can't put down my thoughts so far as i don't know where to start, i can't find an equation that let's you find distance with the data given so far, i would need to know the charge on the zinc & alpha particles ? i guess i can work this out from the charges on the protons & neutrons ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The alpha particle is made of two protons and two neutrons. What is the charge of a proton? And what is the charge of a neutron? Can you find out what is the charge of the alpha particle then?
The same for the zinc nucleus. It contains 30 protons and 35 neutrons. What is its charge?

ehild
 
ok so

charge on a proton = 1.602x10^-19 C
charge on a neutron = 0

so total charge on the zinc is
30 x 1.602x20^-19 C = 4.806x10^-19

for the alpha particle
2 x 1.602x10^-19 C = 3.2x10^-19 C

now i need an equation for distance, this equation looks the closest ?

Eel = q1q2/4.Pi.Eo.r^2

but i have 2 unknowns Eel & r, unless i can get Eel from the kinetic energy
 
"so total charge on the zinc is
30 x 1.602x20^-19 C = 4.806x10^-19" wrong, it is 4.806x10^-18 C.

As the problem does not state the position of the alpha particle where its kinetic energy is given you can assume that it is very far away, where its potential energy is zero. The particle moves towards the nucleus and its potential energy increases, up to the point, where all its initial kinetic energy is transformed to potential energy. You have to find the distance from the nucleus where this happens.

ehild
 
ehild said:
"

As the problem does not state the position of the alpha particle where its kinetic energy is given you can assume that it is very far away, where its potential energy is zero. The particle moves towards the nucleus and its potential energy increases, up to the point, where all its initial kinetic energy is transformed to potential energy. You have to find the distance from the nucleus where this happens.

ehild

Does this mean you can assume E_el is zero and rearrange the equation
E_el = q_1xq_2/4piE_or
so that r is the subject and work out the answer that way?
Thanks
 
coz said:
Does this mean you can assume E_el is zero and rearrange the equation
E_el = q_1xq_2/4piE_or
so that r is the subject and work out the answer that way?
Thanks

I don't think my above thoughts would work, as E_el would only equal zero when r = infinity and I am trying to work out r (in terms of the radius of the zinc nucleus). Back to the drawing board! :)
 
What do you mean on E_el?

The energy of the alpha particle is the sum of its kinetic energy and electric potential energy. This sum is equal to its initial kinetic energy. When its stops the KE =0, and the entire energy is electric. Find r where this happens.

ehild
 
Sorry, I meant electrostatic potential energy when I said E_el
 
ehild said:
What do you mean on E_el?

The energy of the alpha particle is the sum of its kinetic energy and electric potential energy. This sum is equal to its initial kinetic energy. When its stops the KE =0, and the entire energy is electric. Find r where this happens.

ehild

The initial kinetic energy is 1.20x10^-12 J, so the electric energy is also 1.20x10^-12 J.

Can I rearrange E=q1q2/4[tex]\pi[/tex][tex]\epsilon[/tex]0r to find r?
 
  • #10
So find r where

[tex]E_{el}=\frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\frac{q1*q2}{r}=1.2*10^{-12 }J[/tex]

Yes, you can rearrange to get r.

ehild
 
  • #11
ehild said:
So find r where

[tex]E_{el}=\frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\frac{q1*q2}{r}=1.2*10^{-12 }J[/tex]

Yes, you can rearrange to get r.

ehild

Cool, thank you so much. I get r = 1.15x10^-14 m

Just one more thing, the question says to express your answer in terms of the radius of the zinc nucleus. I'm not sure what this means. The radius of the zinc nucleus is 2.00x10^-14 m.

Thanks again :)
 
  • #12
It means r/R(Zn)= 0.575 R(Zn).

So the alpha particle goes into the Zn nucleus almost halfway to its centre. Of course, it is not true really, because the situation is completely different inside the nucleus and outside it. That poor zinc nucleus might explode, I am afraid.
 
  • #13
Just a thought, isn't 2.00x10^-13cm actually 2.00x10^-15 metres?
 
  • #14
Kawakaze said:
Just a thought, isn't 2.00x10^-13cm actually 2.00x10^-15 metres?

Ooops... you are right. I did not look at the first post. So the nucleus will survive.

ehild
 
  • #15
I hope you are wrong there. I just had a paper with this question on and I already submitted it!

r/R(Zn) = [tex]\frac{1.15 x 10^-14}{2.0 x 10^-15}[/tex]

Which i got to be 5.75. or enough to reach the centre of the nucleus.

Or is it R(Zn)/r, I have to admit i don't really get this part of the question.
 
Last edited:
  • #16
Help... please explain how a nucleus containing 65 ions be smaller in diameter than one containing 4? Am i just confused here.
 

Similar threads

Replies
28
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
9K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
2K