Graduate Minimum uncertainty in electron position

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the minimum uncertainty in an electron's position (Δx) and its relationship to energy uncertainty (ΔE) as described by the Heisenberg uncertainty principle. Theoretically, Δx can be made arbitrarily small, but this increases Δp, the uncertainty in momentum. Experimental evidence suggests that the smallest Δx achieved is around 10^-15 meters, based on deep inelastic scattering experiments involving high-energy electrons and quarks. The conversation also highlights the challenges in measuring an electron's position during scattering events, as the exact state vector cannot be determined due to interaction complexities. Overall, the minimum possible Δx for an isolated electron remains a topic of theoretical exploration and experimental limitation.
FrederikPhysics
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
I am wondering about the minimum possible uncertainty (standard deviation) in an electron's position (Δx). How precise can one know the electron's whereabouts without creating other sorts of particles and phenomenons.
I know of the localization energy interpretation of the energy uncertainty (ΔE). Using a Heisenberg relation we estimate Δx as
ΔEΔx≈ħc/2 ⇒ Δx≈ħ/2mc,​
since E=mc2 for an isolated electron (m is the rest mass). If Δx is smaller than this, extra localization energy manifests itself through other particles.

Now the questions are simple. Is this interpretation valid? What is the actual minimum possible Δx for an isolated electron? Have this been measured?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Wasn't it ##\Delta p\Delta x \ge \displaystyle {\hbar\over 2}## ?
 
FrederikPhysics said:
How precise can one know the electron's whereabouts without creating other sorts of particles and phenomenons.

This is much too vague. What "other sorts of particles and phenomenons" are you thinking of?

FrederikPhysics said:
What is the actual minimum possible Δx for an isolated electron?

Theoretically, there is none; you can make ##\Delta x## as small as you like (as long as it's not zero), at the cost of making ##\Delta p## larger.

I'm not sure what the smallest ##\Delta x## is that has been achieved experimentally, but I think it's somewhere around the size of an atomic nucleus, about ##10^{-15}## meters. I'm basing that on the deep inelastic scattering experiments that first provided evidence for quarks; in these experiments, high energy electrons were fired into nuclei and scattered off quarks inside the nuclei, meaning that the electrons' positions had to be within the size of the nucleus, roughly, for the scattering to occur.
 
Just as a side remark to post # 3: in whatever deep inelastic scattering of (fundamental or not) particles which are highly accelerated (energies of many GeV), there's no practical/theoretical way to test if the (non-relativistic) HUP is valid or not, for you can never measure the position of a particle in a scattering event, nor can you calculate its exact state vector. Remember that ##\Delta x## (the standard deviation from the mean) is theoretically computed as the statistical spread of the expectation values of x and x2 in the scattering state call it ##\psi(t)##. You cannot determine the state, because, due to the interaction term, the SE is not solvable, therefore you cannot calculate any expectation value.
 
I am slowly going through the book 'What Is a Quantum Field Theory?' by Michel Talagrand. I came across the following quote: One does not" prove” the basic principles of Quantum Mechanics. The ultimate test for a model is the agreement of its predictions with experiments. Although it may seem trite, it does fit in with my modelling view of QM. The more I think about it, the more I believe it could be saying something quite profound. For example, precisely what is the justification of...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
8K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K