Mirror Reflection of a Wave: Analyzing the Outgoing Wave

  • Thread starter Thread starter cedricyu803
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mirror Wave
Click For Summary
In (1+1)D Minkowski spacetime, an incoming plane wave is reflected by a mirror, leading to an outgoing wave described by the equation φ_out = e^{-iω(2τ_u - u)}, where u = t - x and τ_u is the retarded time. The discussion emphasizes the need to ensure proper directionality for the outgoing wave, which is achieved by matching the function values at the mirror's position. The constant velocity case simplifies to φ_out = e^{-iω(1+v)/(1-v)·u}, illustrating the effects of Doppler shifts. The solution involves calculating the amplitude A by enforcing continuity at the mirror, resulting in A = e^{-iω(2z(τ))}. The analysis presents a structured approach to understanding wave reflection in relativistic contexts.
cedricyu803
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
Hi,

In (1+1)D Minkowski spacetime, with coordinates (t,x),

let's say there is an incoming plane wave of frequency \omega,
\phi_{in}(t,x)=e^{-i\omega (t+x)}.

There is a mirror, x=z(t)

It reflects the incoming plane wave and emits an outgoing plane wave.

Question:
why is the outgoing wave
\phi_{out}=e^{-i\omega (2\tau_u-u)},
where
u=t-x,
\tau_u-z(\tau_u)=u,
i.e. it is the retarded time.
??

For mirror at constant velocity v, this reduces to

\phi_{out}=e^{-i\omega\frac{1+v}{1-v}\cdot u},
the two Doppler shifts are obvious.

But how can I prove the general expression?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I look at this as a 2-step problem.
Step 1. Ensure proper directionality
##\phi_{in} = e^{-i\omega(t+x)}## so the reflection will be headed in the opposite direction
##\phi_{out} = Ae^{-i\omega(t-x)}##.
Step 2. Match function value at ##x=z(t)## i.e. enforce continuity at the mirror.
##\phi_{in}(\tau,z(\tau)) = e^{-i\omega(\tau+z(\tau))} = Ae^{-i\omega(\tau-z(\tau))}=\phi_{out}(\tau,z(\tau))##
Solving for A gives:
##A = \frac{e^{-i\omega(\tau+z(\tau))}}{e^{-i\omega(\tau-z(\tau))}} = e^{-i\omega (2 z(\tau) )}##

For the constant velocity term, it looks like ##\tau## and ##z(\tau)## can be determined by v, and some simplification is applied.
 
RUber said:
I look at this as a 2-step problem.
Step 1. Ensure proper directionality
##\phi_{in} = e^{-i\omega(t+x)}## so the reflection will be headed in the opposite direction
##\phi_{out} = Ae^{-i\omega(t-x)}##.
Step 2. Match function value at ##x=z(t)## i.e. enforce continuity at the mirror.
##\phi_{in}(\tau,z(\tau)) = e^{-i\omega(\tau+z(\tau))} = Ae^{-i\omega(\tau-z(\tau))}=\phi_{out}(\tau,z(\tau))##
Solving for A gives:
##A = \frac{e^{-i\omega(\tau+z(\tau))}}{e^{-i\omega(\tau-z(\tau))}} = e^{-i\omega (2 z(\tau) )}##

For the constant velocity term, it looks like ##\tau## and ##z(\tau)## can be determined by v, and some simplification is applied.
Oh right!
Thanks!
 
In an inertial frame of reference (IFR), there are two fixed points, A and B, which share an entangled state $$ \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(|0>_A|1>_B+|1>_A|0>_B) $$ At point A, a measurement is made. The state then collapses to $$ |a>_A|b>_B, \{a,b\}=\{0,1\} $$ We assume that A has the state ##|a>_A## and B has ##|b>_B## simultaneously, i.e., when their synchronized clocks both read time T However, in other inertial frames, due to the relativity of simultaneity, the moment when B has ##|b>_B##...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
847
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K