Mirror Reflection of a Wave: Analyzing the Outgoing Wave

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter cedricyu803
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mirror Wave
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the analysis of wave reflection in (1+1)D Minkowski spacetime, specifically addressing the behavior of an incoming plane wave represented by the equation \(\phi_{in}(t,x)=e^{-i\omega (t+x)}\) and its outgoing counterpart \(\phi_{out}=e^{-i\omega (2\tau_u-u)}\). The outgoing wave's formulation incorporates the retarded time, defined by the relationship \(\tau_u-z(\tau_u)=u\). For a mirror moving at a constant velocity \(v\), the outgoing wave simplifies to \(\phi_{out}=e^{-i\omega\frac{1+v}{1-v}\cdot u}\), illustrating the Doppler effect. The analysis is structured as a two-step problem: ensuring proper directionality and enforcing continuity at the mirror's position.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of (1+1)D Minkowski spacetime
  • Familiarity with wave equations and plane waves
  • Knowledge of Doppler effect in wave physics
  • Proficiency in mathematical manipulation of complex exponentials
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of wave equations in Minkowski spacetime
  • Explore the implications of the Doppler effect on wave frequency
  • Investigate the concept of retarded time in wave propagation
  • Learn about continuity conditions in wave reflection scenarios
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, particularly those specializing in wave mechanics and relativity, as well as students studying advanced concepts in theoretical physics and mathematical physics.

cedricyu803
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
Hi,

In (1+1)D Minkowski spacetime, with coordinates (t,x),

let's say there is an incoming plane wave of frequency \omega,
\phi_{in}(t,x)=e^{-i\omega (t+x)}.

There is a mirror, x=z(t)

It reflects the incoming plane wave and emits an outgoing plane wave.

Question:
why is the outgoing wave
\phi_{out}=e^{-i\omega (2\tau_u-u)},
where
u=t-x,
\tau_u-z(\tau_u)=u,
i.e. it is the retarded time.
??

For mirror at constant velocity v, this reduces to

\phi_{out}=e^{-i\omega\frac{1+v}{1-v}\cdot u},
the two Doppler shifts are obvious.

But how can I prove the general expression?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I look at this as a 2-step problem.
Step 1. Ensure proper directionality
##\phi_{in} = e^{-i\omega(t+x)}## so the reflection will be headed in the opposite direction
##\phi_{out} = Ae^{-i\omega(t-x)}##.
Step 2. Match function value at ##x=z(t)## i.e. enforce continuity at the mirror.
##\phi_{in}(\tau,z(\tau)) = e^{-i\omega(\tau+z(\tau))} = Ae^{-i\omega(\tau-z(\tau))}=\phi_{out}(\tau,z(\tau))##
Solving for A gives:
##A = \frac{e^{-i\omega(\tau+z(\tau))}}{e^{-i\omega(\tau-z(\tau))}} = e^{-i\omega (2 z(\tau) )}##

For the constant velocity term, it looks like ##\tau## and ##z(\tau)## can be determined by v, and some simplification is applied.
 
RUber said:
I look at this as a 2-step problem.
Step 1. Ensure proper directionality
##\phi_{in} = e^{-i\omega(t+x)}## so the reflection will be headed in the opposite direction
##\phi_{out} = Ae^{-i\omega(t-x)}##.
Step 2. Match function value at ##x=z(t)## i.e. enforce continuity at the mirror.
##\phi_{in}(\tau,z(\tau)) = e^{-i\omega(\tau+z(\tau))} = Ae^{-i\omega(\tau-z(\tau))}=\phi_{out}(\tau,z(\tau))##
Solving for A gives:
##A = \frac{e^{-i\omega(\tau+z(\tau))}}{e^{-i\omega(\tau-z(\tau))}} = e^{-i\omega (2 z(\tau) )}##

For the constant velocity term, it looks like ##\tau## and ##z(\tau)## can be determined by v, and some simplification is applied.
Oh right!
Thanks!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K