Help to understand the derivation of the solution of this equation

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the derivation of solutions to equations related to wave optics in gravitational lensing, specifically referencing T. T. Nakamura's 1999 article. The key equations involve the enhancement factor F and its relationship to the Schrödinger equation, with the Eikonal Approximation simplifying the analysis. The final expression for F incorporates the Bessel function of zero order, indicating a complex integration process. Participants seek clarification on the path integral formulation and the role of the potential U in the equations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of wave optics principles and gravitational lensing.
  • Familiarity with partial differential equations and their applications in physics.
  • Knowledge of the Eikonal Approximation and its implications in wave mechanics.
  • Basic concepts of path integral formulation in quantum mechanics.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the path integral formulation of quantum mechanics in detail.
  • Explore the WKB approximation and its applications in solving differential equations.
  • Review Bessel functions, particularly J0, and their significance in wave equations.
  • Investigate classical techniques for solving wave equations in optics, referencing texts like Born and Wolf.
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, graduate students in optics or quantum mechanics, and researchers interested in gravitational lensing and wave equations will benefit from this discussion.

needved
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Please, help here people.
Im reading this article Wave Optics in Gravitational Lensing (T. T. Nakamura, 1999) . In the article start work with
\begin{equation}

(\nabla ^2 +\omega)\tilde\phi = 4\omega^2U\tilde\phi

\end{equation}
where $$\tilde\phi = F(\vec r)\tilde\phi_{0}(r)$$. Using espherical coordinates and the physical condition $$\theta \ll 1$$ and using a two-dimensional vector $$\Theta = \theta(Cos \varphi , Sen \varphi)$$ they can put the last equation in therms of enhancement factor F
\begin{equation}

\frac{\partial^2 F}{\partial r^2}+2i\omega\frac{\partial F}{\partial r}+\frac{1}{r}\nabla_{\theta}^{2}F=4\omega^2 UF

\end{equation}

where $$\nabla_{\theta}^{2}$$ are the partials in polar and azimuthal coordinates.
A second physical condition, that they called **Eikonal Approximation** lead to considering the termn $$\frac{\partial^2 F}{\partial r^2}\approx 0$$ and at the right side of the equation they do $$V=2\omega U$$
rearrengment the remaining equation
\begin{equation}

\left [ -\frac{1}{2\omega r^2}\nabla_{\theta}^{2}+V \right]F=i\frac{\partial}{\partial r}F

\end{equation}

this last equation is like the Schroedinger equation with the variable $$r$$ instead $$t$$ and $$\omega$$ instead $$\mu$$

\begin{equation}

\left [ -\frac{\hbar}{2\mu}\nabla^{2}+V \right]\Psi=i\hbar\frac{\partial}{\partial t}\Psi

\end{equation}
they says, the correspondent Lagrangian is
\begin{equation}

L(r,\Theta, \dot\Theta) =\omega\left[\frac{1}{2} r^2(\dot\Theta)^2 - 2 U\right]

\end{equation}
where $$\dot\Theta=\frac{d\Theta}{dr}$$ .At this point i have a clue (more or less) about what are they doing. The problem is from this point and on...The article says, from the path integral formulation of the Quantum mechanic, the solution to the equation \begin{equation}

F(\vec r_{0})=\int D \Theta (r) e^{\int_{0}^{r_{0}}L(r,\Theta, \dot\Theta)dr}

\end{equation}

eventually, working with this last expresion lead them to a solution given by\begin{equation}

F(\omega , y)=-i\omega e^{i\frac{\omega y^2}{2}}\int_{0}^{\infty} xJ_{0}(\omega xy) e^{i\omega[\frac{1}{2}x^2-\psi (x)]} dx

\end{equation}where $$J_{0}$$ is the bessel function of zeroeth order.
please, can help me to understand how work with the path integral so i can obtain the last equation. Any helpful hint will be very preciated and will be welcomed.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Can't help you with the path integral but what happened to ##U##? It no longer appears in Equation (7)? Also there are classical techniques to solve equations like (1) which don't use (or aren't called) path integrals. WKB comes to mind. Look at optics texts like Born and Wolf.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K