I Mistake in Schaum's Group Theory?

  • #51
Mark44 said:
If I understand what your notation conveys, the last bit should be ## \stackrel{+\frac{1}{4}}{\hookrightarrow} (0,1)##, since you're adding 1/4 to each element of the punctured interval (-1/4, 1/4).
No, I just wanted to shift it into the interval injectively. The amount didn't matter. With ##\frac{1}{4}## I would have had to deal with the zero, which I avoided by taking ##\frac{1}{3}##.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #52
fresh_42 said:
We still have the difficulty that zero divisors are possible as long as we haven't a group. The (unique) solvability of ##x A = B## is equivalent to the group axioms, so we circle around the main topic. Guess we have to visit La La Land.
Where are you getting your scalars? We're talking coefficients in a field of characteristic zero now, aren't we?
 
  • #53
WWGD said:
Where are you getting your scalars? We're talking coefficients in a field of characteristic zero now, aren't we?
O.k., but matrices can still multiply to zero. However, since @mathwonk #49 I consider our riddle solved.
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
926
Replies
13
Views
562
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
429
Back
Top