MHB Mixing Teas for Profit: A 25% Return

  • Thread starter Thread starter splodge1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mixing
splodge1
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
A tea importer mixes tea bought at £5.20/kg with tea at £5.60/kg. He sells this blend at £6.80/kg making a profit of 25% on his cost price. In what ratio does he mix the teas?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello and welcome to MHB, splodge! :D

We ask that our users show their progress (work thus far or thoughts on how to begin) when posting questions. This way our helpers can see where you are stuck or may be going astray and will be able to post the best help possible without potentially making a suggestion which you have already tried, which would waste your time and that of the helper.

Can you post what you have done so far?
 
Let's let $T_1$ be the amount of the less expensive tea in a kg of the mix and $T_2$ be the amount of the more expensive tea in a kg of the mix. So right away, we know:

$$T_1+T_2=1\tag{1}$$

Now, if the seller is making a 25% profit, then his cost is $$\frac{4}{5}$$ of the selling price, and so we may write:

$$5.2T_1+5.6T_2=0.8\cdot6.8=5.44$$

Multiplying through by 12.5, we have

$$65T_1+70T_2=68\tag{2}$$

Multiplying (1) by 65 and then subtracting it from (2), we get:

$$5T_2=3\implies T_2=\frac{3}{5}\implies T_1=\frac{2}{5}$$

And so we find:

$$T_1:T_2=2:3$$
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top