Model for Gravity -- What mechanism distorts space in the real case?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the mechanisms behind gravity as described by General Relativity (GR), specifically the Einstein Field Equations (EFE). Participants clarify that while visual models like the rubber sheet analogy help conceptualize gravity, they do not accurately represent the underlying mechanisms. The EFE, represented as G^{\mu\nu}=8\pi T^{\mu\nu}, serves as the mathematical framework that describes how mass distorts spacetime. The conversation emphasizes that GR provides a robust theoretical foundation, predicting phenomena such as black holes and gravitational waves without necessitating a simplistic "mechanism" explanation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of General Relativity and its implications.
  • Familiarity with the Einstein Field Equations (EFE).
  • Basic knowledge of spacetime curvature and its representation.
  • Concept of stress-energy tensor in physics.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Einstein Field Equations in detail to understand their implications in gravitational physics.
  • Explore the ADM formalism in General Relativity for insights into spacetime dynamics.
  • Research the mathematical representation of spacetime curvature and its physical interpretations.
  • Investigate the predictions of General Relativity, including gravitational waves and black hole formation.
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of theoretical physics, and anyone interested in the mathematical foundations of gravity and spacetime dynamics.

  • #61
PeterDonis said:
These are interesting, but I would make one caution: the "sector model" approach helps to visualize spatial curvature, but that is not the same as spacetime curvature. And the difference can often be quite stark.

For example, consider the black hole example. The "sector models" visualizations show that the spatial curvature around a black hole is positive radially but negative tangentially. However, the spacetime curvature is the opposite: radially it is negative (geodesics diverge) while tangentially it is positive (geodesics converge).

So I think one has to be very careful with such pedagogical methods.
That is an issue, and while the author does explicitly address it, the solution does require a fairly advanced knowledge of special relativity.

To quote from the first paper: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1405.0323.pdf

In a spatial sector model a sector is rotated in order to lay it alongside the neighbouring sector. In the spatiotemporal case the rotation is replaced by a Lorentz transformation.

It's a step up from the proposal I often uses, saying that General relativity can be thought of as drawing space-time diagrams on "curved surfaces", going into much more detail about what is meant by a "curved surface". I always give that a very short shrift when I mention it, saying that a sphere is an example of what I mean by a curved surface and not attempting a more general definition.

While the required knowledge of special relativity is a bit advanced, it's IMO more accessible and practical than trying to present differential geometry at the same intermediate level to the same audience.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: robphy

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 73 ·
3
Replies
73
Views
15K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 95 ·
4
Replies
95
Views
8K