Modelling the motion of a meteor

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion focuses on modeling the motion of a meteor as it travels through the atmosphere, particularly considering factors such as mass loss upon impact, air resistance, and the dependence of air density on height. Participants are exploring the mathematical formulation and numerical methods required to solve the differential equations governing the meteor's trajectory.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant outlines the need to account for mass loss and air resistance in the meteor's motion model, assuming constant gravitational field strength.
  • Another participant suggests using the shooting method for numerical solutions and identifies several undefined parameters, proposing assumptions to simplify the problem.
  • A later reply clarifies that the only undefined parameter is the initial mass, m(0), and confirms that linear units will be in meters.
  • Participants discuss the energy required to vaporize meteoric material and its implications for the mass loss equation.
  • There is a suggestion that the participant may have integrated the mass loss equation incorrectly, potentially missing a constant.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the need to use the shooting method and identify m(0) as the primary undefined parameter. However, there is uncertainty regarding the correct formulation of the mass loss equation and the implications of the parameters involved.

Contextual Notes

Participants note potential issues with the integration of the mass loss equation and the importance of unit consistency, but do not resolve these concerns.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for students or researchers interested in numerical methods for solving differential equations in the context of atmospheric physics and meteor dynamics.

PeterH
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
Hi!
I am to model the motion of a meteor as it travels through the atmosphere, taking into account the loss of mass, which is 0.025 kg upon impact (height = 0). I also have to take into account the air resistance on the meteor, the fact that the air density is a function of height and that the orthographic projection of the meteor perpendicular the direction of movement (part of the air resistance equation) is a function of the mass of the meteor.
I assume that gravitational field strength is constant.

I have attached a picture of the equations I have been able to derive so far using standard formulas.

I have to solve the differential equations for x(t) and y(t), however, I have tried and failed and therefore seek help.

I can assure you that I am in no way trying to get out of doing some homework; this is for a very important school project and I really need help, so even the smallest hint would be greatly appreciated!
View attachment 3671
 

Attachments

  • Mat.jpg
    Mat.jpg
    41 KB · Views: 128
Physics news on Phys.org
You will need to do this numerically using the shooting method. You appear to have at least four undefined parameters: $c_D$, $\rho_m$, $\zeta$ and $m(0)$. One of these can be disposed of by assuming that you are interested only in high Reynolds numbers when $c_D\approx 1$ (see this). The shooting method uses only one, and in this case I presume that it should be $m(0)$. I think for your purposes you can assume that $\rho_m \approx 3$, or if you know what type it is you can use a better estimate (Google for it). Which leaves you with $\zeta$ to sort out and since I don't know what this represents I can't help with that.

You start by reformulating your equations as a first order system which is integrated numerically (with some guess at the initial mass) until $y=0$ then you record the residual mass at that time. Repeat with a different initial mass (adjusting your initial mass up of down depending on if the final mass was too high or too low).

Repeat until you get convergence using some sort of bisection method once you manage to bracket the initial mass.

Note: I don't think the equation for the mass as a function of time looks right, we would usually take $t=0$ to be the initial time, but then your initial mass will be zero. Also, you need to be careful of units, are the linear units metres or kilometres?

CB
 
Last edited:
Thank you.

The only undefined parameter is m(0).
The linear units will be meters.

As for the rate of loss of mass, I have it from here:
1951ApJ...113..475C Page 475
I may have integrated it wrongly. Could it be that I'm missing a constant, m(0), in the equation?

ζ is the energy needed to vaporize 1 g of meteoric material from its inital temperature, which I have estimated to be 8.11 kJ. Depending on whether I will calculate mass in g or kg, I may use 8.11*10^3 kJ instead.View attachment 3672
 

Attachments

  • Math.jpg
    Math.jpg
    25.3 KB · Views: 133
PeterH said:
Thank you.

The only undefined parameter is m(0).

Then the shooting method should work.

CB
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
5K