Modern Physics Text: Any suggestions?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on recommendations for modern physics textbooks suitable for self-study. Key suggestions include "Modern Physics" by Serway, "Quantum Physics of Atoms, Molecules, Solids, Nuclei, and Particles" by Robert Eisberg and Robert Resnick, and Griffith's text. Participants express mixed opinions about Tipler's book, with many favoring Resnick for its clarity and accessibility. The consensus emphasizes the importance of personal preference and suggests reviewing books at a library before purchasing.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of calculus and ordinary differential equations
  • Familiarity with classical physics concepts
  • Knowledge of quantum mechanics fundamentals
  • Ability to evaluate educational resources and reviews
NEXT STEPS
  • Research "Quantum Physics of Atoms, Molecules, Solids, Nuclei, and Particles" by Eisberg and Resnick
  • Explore Griffith's modern physics textbook for comparative analysis
  • Investigate Schaum's Outline of Modern Physics for additional exercises
  • Visit a university library to review recommended textbooks before purchase
USEFUL FOR

Students and self-learners in physics, educators seeking textbook recommendations, and anyone interested in modern physics concepts and self-study resources.

Saladsamurai
Messages
3,009
Reaction score
7
If this is not the appropriate forum, I apologize. I just assume it is the forum where the people reading this will have the most insight on the matter.

I am looking to purchase a modern physics text to study at my own pace. I have a fairly good understanding of calculus and ordinary differential equations along with classical physics (at least to the extent that I have completed these courses at my college).

So far the only recommendation I have gotten has been Serway's Modern Physics. I have read some good reviews on it and also some terrible ones. In said terrible reviews, the name Tipler has come up as an alternative a few times.

Anyone have any suggestions?

Thanks for your time
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Modern physics is such a strange term, but I guess well recognized. Take a look at Eisberg & Resnick's Quantum Physics book. Might be good for you, might not.
 
Sweet. Moved to the forum that absolutely nobody looks in.

Resnick looks pretty good for me. I liked his text on classical.

Any others?
 
Saladsamurai said:
Resnick looks pretty good for me. I liked his text on classical.

It's between this and Griffith's...
 
Saladsamurai said:
It's between this and Griffith's...

Anyone else before I buy Resnick?
 
We used Tipler in my class. The first couple chapters were decent, but it was all downhill from there. pretty awful book; go with Resnick.
 
People have mixed feelings about Resnick. What do you want to learn? There's modern physics for people who might not go on to proper quantum mechanics, relativity, etc. For those I might recommend another book.

Try getting a copy from the library before you shell out money. People have mixed feelings about Eisberg/Resnick. I think it is a good book for what it aims to do, but there are people who try to pass senior QM using it, and that is not such a good idea. That said, I think it's a good deal.
 
Saladsamurai said:
If this is not the appropriate forum, I apologize. I just assume it is the forum where the people reading this will have the most insight on the matter.

I am looking to purchase a modern physics text to study at my own pace. I have a fairly good understanding of calculus and ordinary differential equations along with classical physics (at least to the extent that I have completed these courses at my college).

So far the only recommendation I have gotten has been Serway's Modern Physics. I have read some good reviews on it and also some terrible ones. In said terrible reviews, the name Tipler has come up as an alternative a few times.

Anyone have any suggestions?

Thanks for your time


I absolutely loved Eisberg and Resnick when I was an undergraduate. They take the time to explain the phyiscs and the math level is fairly basic, making it very good for self-study.

But liking a book is extremely subjective. What you should definitely do is to go to a university library and get the book. If you can't borrow it, just go sit and spend a few hours reading it. Then you will see if that's a good fit for you.
 
  • #10
nrqed said:
I absolutely loved Eisberg and Resnick when I was an undergraduate. They take the time to explain the phyiscs and the math level is fairly basic, making it very good for self-study.

But liking a book is extremely subjective. What you should definitely do is to go to a university library and get the book. If you can't borrow it, just go sit and spend a few hours reading it. Then you will see if that's a good fit for you.

You're right, this is too subjective a question. Just like all of the reviews at Amazon, everyone in this thread has different complaints and compliments on the same books.

I really liked Resnick's text on classical, so I think I will go with that.

Thanks folks
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
939
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
680
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K