Modern Steam Car: Costs, Efficiency, & Everyday Use

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the feasibility of modern steam cars, particularly regarding production costs, fuel efficiency, and everyday usability. Participants highlight that while steam engines may have lower production costs due to fewer components, the lack of a prototype raises concerns about performance claims. Key issues include the need for a highly pressurized boiler, potential vibration comparable to existing piston engines, and the questionable fuel efficiency metrics presented. Overall, skepticism remains regarding the economic viability and engineering challenges of steam vehicles.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of steam engine mechanics
  • Knowledge of thermodynamic cycles
  • Familiarity with internal combustion engine efficiency metrics
  • Basic principles of vehicle design and engineering
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the thermodynamic efficiency of steam engines compared to internal combustion engines
  • Explore the design and safety considerations of high-pressure boilers in automotive applications
  • Investigate existing prototypes of steam cars and their performance metrics
  • Learn about advancements in steam turbine technology for automotive use
USEFUL FOR

Automotive engineers, alternative fuel researchers, and anyone interested in the development and viability of steam-powered vehicles.

wolram
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
Messages
4,410
Reaction score
551
modern steam car

If found this website on steam cars
http://www.geocities.com/MotorCity/Shop/3589/
The author seems very down to earth, and his project worthwhile.
I wondered as he mentions, about the production costs of
such vehicles, the engines would surly be cheap to produce
en mass, and with no gear box and few controls this vehicle
would be as easy to drive as an electric car
So what do you think on,
! cost of production
2 fuel efficency
3 every day usage ?
 
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
In another thread we talked about diesel-electric: the advantage is that you can run a diesel at constant speed at its most efficient rpm and *maybe* get an efficiency advantage out of it. You could do the same with a steam engine and probably do even better thermodynamically.

However, this guy has no basis for his claims: he hasn't even built a prototype of the engine so he couldn't possibly know how it will perform in a car. In addition, there are some major problems with some of his other claims:

-The vibration would be comparable to existing cars because this is still a piston -engine (a steam turbine would be better and more efficient).
-Steam engines have a power/efficiency curve like any other engine: even if they are flatter than a gas engine (they probably are), it still needs gearing.
-It would be quieter than a normal car, but not enough to be worth advertising that as an advantage: it would not compare to an electric car.
-As with all thermodynamic cycles, compression ratio is everything: this car would require a highly pressurized boiler, and that's dangerous.

Bottom line: he hasn't built anything yet so he doesn't really know anything about how this car will run yet.
 
I'm more concerned with the fuel efficiency, he says it uses no fuel on idle but also says that there is constantly a pilot light maintaining pressure in the boiler, even when the car is left for long periods of time, and these statements directly counteract each other. His efficiency page directly compares thermal efficiencies of regular internal combustion engines with that of 'existing' steam vehicles, but this is not a direct comparison of fuel mileage figures. 25mpg? I guess he's appealing to some of you SUV owners there...

I'm not saying he's wrong, but I'm yet to be convinced of the economical benefits of running the vehicle, setting aside the engineering issues Russ pointed out.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
12K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
9K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
12K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
31K
Replies
4
Views
10K
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 133 ·
5
Replies
133
Views
28K