Modernising Underpants - Sound Cancelling & Odour Retaining Tech

  • Thread starter Thread starter wolram
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of modernizing underpants with sound-canceling technology and odor-retaining features. Participants explore the feasibility and challenges of implementing these ideas, touching on both theoretical and practical aspects of sound management and material science.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes using up-to-date technology to create sound-canceling underpants that capture sounds and produce anti-sound, but notes challenges with real-time processing and individual tuning.
  • Another suggests a digital approach using a microphone and DSP to play opposite sounds, but acknowledges complexities related to sound modification in different positions.
  • Some participants argue for exploring acoustic damping with specialized fabrics instead of active sound cancellation, citing the need to address sound emanating from the underpants themselves.
  • There are humorous suggestions about using sound-canceling headphones specifically tuned for flatulence and the idea of a "butt-whistle" to limit the frequency range.
  • Concerns are raised about the conservation of energy and its implications for effective noise cancellation in various environments.
  • Participants discuss the potential impact of physical factors, such as the mass of the surrounding medium and the positioning of sound-canceling devices.
  • One participant humorously suggests the use of velcro flies for easier access, while others mention herbal remedies for related issues.
  • A prototype is mentioned, with a participant seeking volunteers to test it under specific dietary conditions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of ideas and approaches, with no clear consensus on the best method for achieving sound cancellation or odor retention. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing views and humorous contributions.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations related to real-time sound processing, individual tuning, and the physical properties of materials used in the proposed designs. There are also unresolved questions about the effectiveness of various sound-canceling methods.

wolram
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
Messages
4,411
Reaction score
551
How can such a basic item of clothing be modernised you ask, well i have come up with an idea for sound cancelling underpants, the idea is to use upto date technology to capture sounds and produce an anti sound, and thus no one will have suffer embarrassment in meetings etc.
The only problem i have, is doing this in real time, this problem arises from the fact that the noise frequency can vary so much, so i will have to spend a lot of time making recordings . It may even be that each pair of underpants has to be tuned to the individual user, which will be a major disadvantage.
In the pipe line is odour retaining pants, but these are not looking promising, as so far they need to be at least 1/2 thick, and with people wanting to wear eye patches, i can not see how these could be packaged.
 
Computer science news on Phys.org
Do it digitally?
Have a microphone, a DSP and play the opposite sound through your iPod headphones.
 
Complex problem! Some of the sound emanates from the underpants, themselves (think of a flag snapping in the wind), and that has to be dealt with. Instead of active sound-cancellation, perhaps you ought to start working along the lines of acoustic damping, with fabric that resists vibration at the relevant range of frequencies.
 
mgb_phys said:
Do it digitally?
Have a microphone, a DSP and play the opposite sound through your iPod headphones.

The problem is more complex, a free standing (noise) from one is unmodified, but with people in a sitting position the sound could be modified, ie, the chair could produce harmonics.
 
turbo-1 said:
Complex problem! Some of the sound emanates from the underpants, themselves (think of a flag snapping in the wind), and that has to be dealt with. Instead of active sound-cancellation, perhaps you ought to start working along the lines of acoustic damping, with fabric that resists vibration at the relevant range of frequencies.

Ah yes ,what frequency does a G string vibrate at?
 
You just need sound cancelling headphones tuned to only cancel farts.
 
Underwear with a cork would be a lot easier.
 
mgb_phys said:
You just need sound cancelling headphones tuned to only cancel farts.


The point of the idea is that others do not perceive the sound, i do not have much of an idea about how much energy is emitted, i guess there could be an OFM difference, like some people just squeak and others blow a trumpet.
 
  • #10
mgb_phys said:
Do it digitally?
Have a microphone, a DSP and play the opposite sound through your iPod headphones.
Probably wouldn't work too well if your fart is high pitched. Also, to effectively cancel at all locations, you'll need to attach the speaker to your butt.
 
  • #11
wolram said:
How can such a basic item of clothing be modernised you ask, well i have come up with an idea for sound cancelling underpants, the idea is to use upto date technology to capture sounds and produce an anti sound, and thus no one will have suffer embarrassment in meetings etc.
The only problem i have, is doing this in real time, this problem arises from the fact that the noise frequency can vary so much, so i will have to spend a lot of time making recordings . It may even be that each pair of underpants has to be tuned to the individual user, which will be a major disadvantage.
In the pipe line is odour retaining pants, but these are not looking promising, as so far they need to be at least 1/2 thick, and with people wanting to wear eye patches, i can not see how these could be packaged.

You might want to consider attacking the problem at the source.

For instance a butt-whistle could limit the frequency range that your noise cancellation apparatus would need to deal with.
 
  • #12
wolram said:
The point of the idea is that others do not perceive the sound, i do not have much of an idea about how much energy is emitted, i guess there could be an OFM difference, like some people just squeak and others blow a trumpet.
The speaker you use will produce a canceling signal that matches the amplitude of the received signal, so that shouldn't be the concern.
 
  • #13
LowlyPion said:
For instance a butt-whistle could limit the frequency range that your noise cancellation apparatus would need to deal with.
Ah! A hybrid passive+active system - what fun!
 
  • #14
I think conservation of energy prevents the noise from cancelling everywhere.
 
  • #15
wolram said:
The point of the idea is that others do not perceive the sound,
Whats the fun in that!
It's only fair to give any surrounding victims a warning before the smell hits them - in fact in version 2 of my system there would be an siren and a flashing light.
 
  • #16
Okay, i think a reed like sensor would be the best, it would depend on accurate possitioning,
and real time electronics, butt i am sure it could be done.
 
  • #17
Gokul43201 said:
Probably wouldn't work too well if your fart is high pitched. Also, to effectively cancel at all locations, you'll need to attach the speaker to your butt.
Pitch is probably proportional to how tightly the butt-cheeks are held together and inversely proportional to the mass of the cheeks. For shapely ladies that favor tight pants, a "soprano" version of the underpants might be necessary. Marketing 101 - know your target customers.
 
  • #18
turbo-1 said:
Pitch is probably proportional to how tightly the butt-cheeks are held together and inversely proportional to the mass of the cheeks. For shapely ladies that favor tight pants, a "soprano" version of the underpants might be necessary. Marketing 101 - know your target customers.

Doe's the mass of the surrounding medium make a difference? i guess it will but would have thought it would have a dampening effect.
 
  • #19
Ivan Seeking said:
I think conservation of energy prevents the noise from cancelling everywhere.
By "everywhere", I meant most everywhere within earshot of the fart.

As for the odor, there's always activated charcoal inserts.

Here's a picture (just in case lisa's reading this thread - she loves pictures like this :wink:)

mensunderwear.jpg
 
  • #20
turbo-1 said:
Pitch is probably proportional to how tightly the butt-cheeks are held together and inversely proportional to the square root of the [/color] mass of the cheeks.
There. Fixed it for you! :biggrin:
 
  • #21
Gokul43201 said:
By "everywhere", I meant most everywhere within earshot of the fart.

Coming soon to S&D: The farting ghost phenomenon.
 
  • #22
wolram said:
Doe's the mass of the surrounding medium make a difference? i guess it will but would have thought it would have a dampening effect.
Not just the mass, but other qualities, as well. There's a reason that organ-pipes aren't made out of lard.
 
  • #23
I told my doctor I suffered from silent, but deadly gas, and he prescribed a hearing aid.
 
  • #24
turbo-1 said:
There's a reason that organ-pipes aren't made out of lard.

I'd be keen to hear you elaborate on this.

Does it have anything to do with fundament frequencies?
 
  • #25
My suggestion would be velcro flies.

I'm fed up of standing at the urinal, fiddling around down there for minutes on end trying to undo tiny buttons just to fetch the wee lad out.
 
  • #26
brewnog said:
My suggestion would be velcro flies.

I'm fed up of standing at the urinal, fiddling around down there for minutes on end trying to undo tiny buttons just to fetch the wee lad out.

You know there are herbal remedies that claim to alleviate this condition.
 
  • #27
brewnog said:
My suggestion would be velcro flies.
I take it you don't work in the espionage business? Or you do, and you're a real quick draw...

VZ2OtD7Afmg[/youtube]
 
  • #28
Thanks for the feed back guys :smile: i have a prototype on the drawing board, now all i have to do is miniaturise every thing, the bass speakers are going to be the biggest problem, so far i have managed to fit every thing into the size of a ghetto blaster.
I just need some volunteers to eat curried sprouts and drink beer to test it out.
 
  • #29
The solution to both problems (finding wolram's miniaturised thing and fitting his amplifier equipment) is obviously kilts!
 
  • #30
mgb_phys said:
The solution to both problems (finding wolram's miniaturised thing and fitting his amplifier equipment) is obviously kilts!


I thought it was Brewey having trouble :confused: the kilt idea has the advantage of hiding the electronics in the sporran.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
8K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
14K